0
What describes the meaning phrase results support the hypothesis?
Wiki User
∙ 10y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What are the 6 steps in a power conclusion?
1. Thesis- "The purpose of this invertigation was.." 2. Hypothesis- "I thought that…If…Then…because…" 3. Answer the TQ- "I found out that… 4. Answer hypothesis- "My data does/does not support my hypothesis because…" 5. Observations- "My data showed that…" 6. Explain Results- "I got my results because…" "The reason _ happened was…" and "I think _ happened because…" 7. Errors- "I think _ could have affected my results because…" 8. Future- "In the future, I would like to…"
What was Darwin's hypothesis about evolution?
19th Century hypothesis: "That adaptations are chosen from enviremental factors meaning that you adapt to your surrondings" yet there are none evidence to support Darwin's evolution (hoax) even at 21st Century (over hundred years after monkey's death). Evolution = Never exist.
How did the results of Beadle and Tatum's experiment support their hypothesis?
As Beadle and Tatum had predicted, they were able to create single gene mutations that incapacitated specific enzymes, so that the molds with these mutations required an external supply of the substance that the enzyme normally produced, and the substance that the enzyme normally used, piled up in the cell. These results led them to the one gene/one enzyme hypothesis, which states that each gene is responsible for directing the building of a single, specific enzyme.
What is the purpose of a conclusion?
to explain why the data support or reject the hypothesis
Why do scientists call evolution a theory?
Because it cannot be proven or replicated.AnswerIn science, a hypothesis is a good idea, a possible explanation, which might be right and might be wrong. Hypotheses can be refuted by experimentation. If the expectation from the hypothesis is not met by the outcome of experiment, the hypothesis is refuted. The longer a hypothesis survives unrefuted the more confidence we have in it. Evidence can support a hypothesis. The more evidence one has in support of a hypothesis, the more grows our confidence in it. Within the philosophy of science of Karl Popper, a hypothesis cannot be proven, but one can have a mighty amount of confidence in one, proportional to the amount of evidence in support of it. Unrefuted and with backing evidence, a hypothesis is promoted to a theory! A theory is better than a hypothesis. Evolution has much evidence from comparative genetics, comparative morphology and the fossil record. Evolution was once a hypothesis. Darwin collected a large mass of evidence for On the Origin of Species and now we have evidence from Mendelian genetics and comparative genetics, which Darwin knew nothing of. We now have a greater fossil record than Darwin did. There is far more evidence these days (for what is now called Neodarwinism or the Modern Synthesis- the combination of genetics and Darwin's basic 1859 ideas) than there was in Darwin's time. Evolution now has so much evidence that it is best to call it a theory, rather than a hypothesis. Yes, theories are unproven, but in Popperian philosophy of science they cannot be proven. Theories survive refutation and have much evidence and explain a lot. Biology regards evolution as its baseline, its most important idea ever. It might only be a theory of which we can only be 99% confident, but it explains everything so well that most biologists should better call it a fact rather than a theory. Evolution is such a good theory that its pedantic differentiation from 'fact' is entirely unnecessary.
What describes a reason for making a prediciton when doigna controlled experiment?
To idicate what specific results will support a hypothesis
Which of the following describes a reason for making a prediction when doing a controlled experiment?
To indicate what specific results will support a hypothesis to anticipate the observations or measurements that will be made apex
Why is hypothesis is discarded as a valid hypothesis?
when results from the experiments repeatedly fail to support the hypothesis.
What do scientists do to determine if their results support their hypothesis?
The results can support their hypothesis by comparing the results, or setting them out in a table or graph. Conclusions can also be written to simplify the process.
Need a scientific sentence with the word hypothesis?
The results of his experiments did not support his hypothesis.
What if the results do not support the hypothesis you were testing?
Then explain why it was wrong
Which describes a reason for making a prediction when doing a controlled experiment?
To determine what sort of data table will be most useful APEX;)
What can scientist do if results of an experiment do not support a hypothesis?
draw conclusions
What can scientists do if the results of an experiments do not support a hypothesis?
draw conclusions
What can a scientist do if the results of an experiment do not support a hypothesis?
draw conclusions
What can scientists do if the results of an experiment do not support a hypothesis?
draw conclusions
What can scientists do if the results of an experiment do not support hypothesis?
draw conclusions
