Well the pyramis in order is like this:pharaohs,governmrnt officials,priests,scribes,artisians,and peasants. It depended on what they were. Royal,religous,smartness and working
how were the social class strctures similar and different in sumer and egypt
In a caste system, a person's social class is determined at birth and typically follows them throughout their life. It is based on the caste into which they are born, with little to no opportunity for mobility or change. Factors such as occupation, wealth, and education are not as significant in determining social status as compared to the caste one is born into.
The small-farmers.
the largest social class in Egypt or ancient rome was made up of what
Farmers.
The small-farmers.
The largest social class was farmers due to the rising population.
Social class based on a person's ancestry is typically referred to as "social status" or "socioeconomic status." This status is determined by factors such as a person's family background, wealth, education level, and occupation. It can influence opportunities and privileges available to individuals in society.
The largest and lowest social class in both Egypt and Rome were made up of common people. In Egypt they were referred to as peasants. In Rome they were called plebeians.
What social groups are there in Egypt there are 4 social groups in egypt: 1st: king and his family 2nd: upper class 3rd: middle class 4th:lower class/unskilled workers HOPE IT HELPED ^__^
The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.
FALSEThe Aztecs did have two distinct social classes: the macehualles or commoners, and the nobility or pilli. The ranks were not determined by birth as one could rise from the macehualles to pilli through great skill and bravery during war.