He collected, observed, and studied them for changes acquired over thousands of years.
He noted the changes in the fossils over time, thus providing evidence for evolution.
dont no
Darwin wondered why so many species had disappeared and how they were related to living species.
Archaeologist Darwin has found a suspicious fossil at the Grand Canyon.
more than 6,000 years old
No, of course not. Evidence does not prove evolution - it validates the theory.Evidence which Darwin had included limited fossils, and observed apparent speciation in birds.
evolution for the first blank
thought they were gorilla noses that fell off ------------------------------------------------------------ No idea what this guy was talking about. :o preserved remains of ancient organisms. <------------- is the answer your looking for :D
The inability to find fossils of a missing link between apes and humans does not reflect negatively on Darwin's theories. Fossils of creatures that old are rare and difficult to find.
Fossils that provided insight into the theory of evolution
Darwin realized after seeing a bunch of fossils (and the differences between the finches on the Galapagos Islands) that animals must be adapting to better fit their environments, and thus, becoming more diverse.
Fish