in your own opinion , which of the philosophical studies in bacon`s essay are relevant to you how could they help you toward developing yourself and improving your lif (of studies francis bacon)?
so he could stand out more !!
Francis Bacon believed that nature should be studied through empirical observation and experimentation to uncover its secrets and laws. He emphasized the importance of induction and the scientific method in understanding the natural world. Bacon's ideas laid the groundwork for modern scientific inquiry.
Abstract reasoning and experimentation could explain nature.
That Nature could be explained through abstract reasoning and experimentation.
all scientist believe animals can think because if an animal could not think it would not move or do anything. they need to think 'move' to move etc.
That Nature could be explained through abstract reasoning and experimentation.The scientific belief that Francis Bacon and Rene Descartes shared was their belief that most of the knowledge that came before was weak, sloppy, and in some cases very wrong. They both believed knowledge should be received by personal observation.
They both contributed to the Scientific method. Francis Bacon did this to make sure that they did not having false thoughts/teachings. Descartes said to gain knowledge to follow those steps. They helped create a new approach to science. Over time, people started calling this new approach the scientific method.
The judge might not believe Francis's testimony due to inconsistencies in his account, lack of corroborating evidence, or an apparent motive to lie. Additionally, the judge could question Francis’s credibility based on his character, past behavior, or any biases that might affect his testimony. If Francis appeared overly emotional or evasive during questioning, it could further undermine his reliability in the eyes of the judge.
Francis Bacon (1561-1626) came up with the scientific method (the Baconian method). Before him there were just natural philosophers. The term "scientist" didn't exist prior to 1833 when William Whewell coined the term (first published in 1834). Thus the social role of scientist as a profession didn't happen until the 19th century (where Whewell himself could be regarded as the first of his kind). Francis Bacon died in 1626, thus he can only be regarded as a scientist reflexively, as can all philosophers prior to 1834. However, to regard Bacon as the first scientist simply because he was a practitioner of his own scientific method is a somewhat restrictive definition. A scientist is, broadly speaking, one who engages in a systematic activity to acquire knowledge. In that sense, even prehistoric man could be regarded as being scientific, particulalrly in terms of agriculture. However, you would probably have to consider Socrates, Plato and Aristotle as the most important of the early philosophers. Aristotle (384-322 BCE) in particular was the first to attribute non-supernatural causes to naturally occurring events such as a earthquakes, and although he wasn't entirely right, his influence over the scientific community as a whole extended well into the Renaissance period before being replaced by Newtonian science.
Nature could be explained through abstract reasoning and experimentation.Abstract reasoning and experimentation could explain nature.
One could make the case for one of five candidates: Machiavelli, Francis Bacon, Thomas Hobbes, Martin Luther, or Galileo.