No he owned a plantation
General US Grant did not believe in slavery. It's true that at one time he worked on a farm that had slavers, however, in order to be a top general with President Lincoln, he had to oppose slavery.
He wanted slavery
Because he believed that slavery was wrong. The Union once had slavery but when they switched to having factories they turned on the idea of slavery.
She was against slavery.
Not slave. Pennsylvania was begun by Quaker William Penn and the Quakers were against slavery. Penn understood discrimination since he had experienced it in England as a Quaker. He got the land grant from the king after his father died and the king gave him the grant to settle a debt he had with the father.
Abraham Lincoln and Ulysses s. grant
Most of the slaves that Grant oversaw in Missouri were actually owned by his father-in-law . They were all set free when the Missouri state government abolished slavery. I think maybe one of his slaves stayed with him to work a free man.
He extended the slavery of the knee grow
He wanted to abolished slavery.
He was the the Union Army's and Lincoln's "General in Chief" at the end of the war.Some people may think that if it wasn't for Ulysses S. Grant, there would still be slavery. Lincoln should be given the credit for ending slavery. Grant's leadership (as a general) brought about the end of the civil war. Grant contributed to the end of slavery. Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation.The main explanation for the origins of the American Civil War, especially the issue of the expansion of slavery into the territories and States rights among other things. Another "main reason" for the American Civil war was to prevent the South from leaving America to become an independent country (secede). Lincoln, the North and others did not want America to become a nation divided. See topics:slavery-in-the-united-statesterritories-of-the-united-statesstates-rights
no they think it cruel. no they think it cruel.
i think it has to do something with slavery.