Not a thing. He was not even in charge of the theatre. He was just a shmo who did his job, and did it very well indeed.
Shakespeare's plays as a rule contain five acts, including Henry V.
England
Elizabeth the first. It was a Elizabethan England.
William Shakespeare was born in 1564, meaning that he lived during the Elizabethan era. This era was defined by the rule of Queen Elizabeth I.
Yes, she was the Queen when he was born and died when he was thirty-nine.
I think because England was under the rule of Queen Elizabeth.
There is no evidence of whether Anne Hathaway, William Shakespeare's wife, was a Catholic or a Protestant. However they did live under the rule of Elizabeth I, a Protestant Queen, who outlawed Catholicism.
William Shakespeare flourished during the rule of Elizabeth I. He is best known for his plays, including "Romeo and Juliet," "Hamlet," and "Macbeth." Shakespeare's works are considered some of the greatest literature in the English language.
"Measure for Measure" by William Shakespeare "The Rule of Four" by Ian Caldwell and Dustin Thomason "A Rule Against Murder" by Louise Penny "The Measure of a Man" by Sidney Poitier
There is only one convention which Shakespeare adheres to, and that is the convention that the characters onstage at the end of a scene cannot come on to start the next scene. The only exception to this rule is Scenes 1 and 2 of Act 2 of Romeo and Juliet.
Davenant is supposed to have claimed so in a letter written in 1644. About this there are four possibilities: 1. There was no connection at all between Davenant and Shakespeare and he made the whole thing up. 2. Shakespeare actually was Davenant's illegitimate son. 3. Shakespeare was Davenant's godfather, so he was Shakespeare's son in this sense. 4. Shakespeare was Davenant's inspiration, so he was the son of his spirit in a kind of metaphorical sense. This is almost certainly what Samuel Butler meant when he said Davenant was Shakespeare's son. Possibilities number three and four are the most likely. Number two is so unlikely that we can probably rule it out.
English spelling was not formalised until the 19th century, and basically the rule was "things are written like they're said".