The impact of world war two in respect of the defense expenditures were immense on every sector of industry and business. So many resources had to be secured by governments for utilization in national defense that great loss was made to major industries who were depended on to make munitions.
The impact of world war two in respect of the defense expenditures were immense on every sector of industry and business. So many resources had to be secured by governments for utilization in national defense that great loss was made to major industries who were depended on to make munitions.
Ruth Leger Sivard has written: 'World Military and Social Expenditures 1991 (World Military and Social Expenditures)' 'World military and social expenditures, 1980' 'Military budgets and social needs' -- subject(s): Appropriations and expenditures, Armed Forces, Government spending policy, Social policy 'World military and social expenditures, 1977' -- subject(s): Appropriations and expenditures, Armed Forces, Government spending policy, Social policy 'World Military and Social Expenditures 1993 (World Military and Social Expenditures)' 'World Military & Social Expenditures 1983'
well i don't have any idea about it............ but good luck
Keynesian economics.
Cleopatra had a great impact on the world of her time. She was the catalyst that caused the final civil war which brought Octavian to power and the change in the Roman government.
The World War 2 had a greater impact considering the strategy adopted by the Russsian government and the their ideology agaist the U S government because both sides were looking for a government that would be of greater advantage to suite their either the capitalist WEST or the communist EAST. So this brought lboth Super Powers to carefully watch themselves and fof one not to be advantageously stock-pilled what could have lead to the whole world be at the dictate of one nation. The Russia government had also known the capability of their rival powr by also going ahead to massively redirecting their defense capabilities and defense expenditure to a very greater height.
The military position of the US and other world powers in 1950 reflected a dominance of the US as the top military power. Here is a list of military forces and funds spent by the major world powers in 1950:1. US-- $14,5 billion on defense with 1.4 million military personnel;2. USSR .. $15.5 billion on defense with 4.3 million military personnel;3. UK .... $2.3 billion on defense with 680,000 military personnel; and4. France...$1.4 billion on defense with 590,000 military personnel.These figures reflect why in 1950, the US was the dominating military power in the world.
P. J. Patterson has written: 'The Challenges of Change' -- subject(s): Appropriations and expenditures, Budget, Economic conditions, Economic policy, Politics and government 'A Jamaican voice in Caribbean and world politics' -- subject(s): Foreign relations, Politics and government, World politics
It is subjective to determine the "most defensive" country in the world as defense capabilities vary based on different factors such as military spending, technology, alliances, and strategic location. Countries like the United States, Russia, and China are known for their strong defense capabilities due to significant military expenditures and advanced weapons systems.
Taxation, imposition of compulsory levies on individuals or entities by governments. Taxes are levied in almost every country of the world, primarily to raise revenue for government expenditures, although they serve other purposes as well.
Military expenditures for the World for 2007 were estimated at 1.2 trillion dollars and the United States was number 1 in 2008 with military expenditures of over 580 billion dollars.
It showed the Czar's weakness and how the army wasn't prepared.