0
What did nietzsche think was wrong with western ideas of reason democracy and progress?
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What ideas did the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche have to say about Western ideas?
The famous existentialist philosopher, Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche seemed to have no kind words for the so-called Judaeo-Christian world and its ideals and ideas. In fact, when reading Nietzsche, one can easily come to the conclusion he hated everything about the world. In this he was a fore-runner of a later day existentialist Jean-Paul Sartre. After all, we are all thrown into this world without our consent, and have no obligation to honor anything but oneself. With that said, his view of Western values can be misleading and difficult to understand. Like Hegel, Nietzsche thinks aloud and his writings display his thinking and rethinking of a multitude of ideas. In Europe, he recalls the "Enlightenment" . To him nothing but nonsense. This is best seen in one of his famous quotes ( he is quoted perhaps more with the exceptions of Aristotle and Plato ) For Nietzsche, it can be seen that throughout immense expanses of time, the intellect has produced nothing but errors. He had no use for other philosophers or Western leaders. He was an apocalyptic thinker and in this way he had an influence on Adolph Hitler. He too was in the school of apocalyptic thinkers. For him and for Nietzsche, all the world came to naught. This is seen in Hitler's ideas as his early military successes showed the valor of Germans. And, later after military disasters in the Soviet Union, he demanded no retreat. If his armies failed, it was because they were not true Germans. To carry this a bit further, one can recall the "no surrender" edict for Japanese forces besieged on Iwo Jima. No surrender possible resulting in 22,000 plus Japanese soldiers being killed.
What was one reason for the end of the western cattle bonanza?
One reason for the end of the western cattle bonanza was--overgrazing of the plains. (NovaNet)
One reason for the end of the western cattle bonanza was?
over grazing of the plains.
What is the reason why some might argue that hamlet should be included in the western canon?
There are a few reasons why some might fuss over hamlet should be in the western canon. The main reason would be the work had appeal across cultures.
Reason western powers favored appeasement?
Western powers favored appeasement because of the disillusionment with war, and did not want any other war after the WWI.
What ideas did the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche have to say about Western ideas?
The famous existentialist philosopher, Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche seemed to have no kind words for the so-called Judaeo-Christian world and its ideals and ideas. In fact, when reading Nietzsche, one can easily come to the conclusion he hated everything about the world. In this he was a fore-runner of a later day existentialist Jean-Paul Sartre. After all, we are all thrown into this world without our consent, and have no obligation to honor anything but oneself. With that said, his view of Western values can be misleading and difficult to understand. Like Hegel, Nietzsche thinks aloud and his writings display his thinking and rethinking of a multitude of ideas. In Europe, he recalls the "Enlightenment" . To him nothing but nonsense. This is best seen in one of his famous quotes ( he is quoted perhaps more with the exceptions of Aristotle and Plato ) For Nietzsche, it can be seen that throughout immense expanses of time, the intellect has produced nothing but errors. He had no use for other philosophers or Western leaders. He was an apocalyptic thinker and in this way he had an influence on Adolph Hitler. He too was in the school of apocalyptic thinkers. For him and for Nietzsche, all the world came to naught. This is seen in Hitler's ideas as his early military successes showed the valor of Germans. And, later after military disasters in the Soviet Union, he demanded no retreat. If his armies failed, it was because they were not true Germans. To carry this a bit further, one can recall the "no surrender" edict for Japanese forces besieged on Iwo Jima. No surrender possible resulting in 22,000 plus Japanese soldiers being killed.
What form of government is best to promote reason and justice in a society?
Democracy Democracy
Why are presidential terms were instituted?
One reason is that it keeps a democracy a democracy, preventing a dictatorship rule.
Why are you in business?
For the reason that you love doing it and it helps make a progress in your life then you are engaging into business.
What was NOT a reason why the Framers opposed direct democracy?
Framers opposed a direct democracy for many reasons. The most important reason is because they were afraid of the rule of a majority.
Why are divisions unavoidable in a democracy?
This is incorrect. You can have a non-divided democracy, it is simply very unlikely that such will occur. The country that has come the closest to this is Japan, which has effectively had one-party rule since liberal democracy was introduced in 1945 because of the cultural preference for "harmony" and "non-dissent".The reason why it is practically impossible for Western democracies to be non-divided is that Western society promotes individualism and individualism makes people seek to promote their own benefits. This leads to political parties where different groups with different desires and schema for improving society come into existence. The contests between political parties make the very divisions common to Western democracy,
Why democracy is popular?
One reason is that democracy equals freedom that no other form of government offers.
Did Plato teach the principles of democracy and reason?
yes
How did enlightenment ideas stimulate nationalism and democracy?
The Age of Enlightenment (or simply the Enlightenment) is the era in Western philosophy, intellectual, scientific and cultural life, centered upon the 18th century, in which reason was advocated as the primary source for legitimacy and authority. It is also known as the Age of Reason.
What are the 5 principles of enlightenment?
Liberty, reason, nature, progress, and happiness
Are divisions inherent to the working of democracy?
Strictly speaking, NO, but for most democracies, divisions are inherent. You can have a non-divided democracy, it is simply very unlikely that such will occur. The country that has come the closest to this is Japan, which has effectively had one-party rule since liberal democracy was introduced in 1945 because of the cultural preference for "harmony" and "non-dissent".The reason why it is practically impossible for Western democracies to be non-divided is that Western society promotes individualism and individualism makes people seek to promote their own benefits. This leads to political parties where different groups with different desires and schema for improving society come into existence. The contests between political parties make the very divisions common to Western democracy,
Fear of too much democracy reason for US Constitution?
Yes
