Nope. They wore nothing. They were poor stupid how are they suppose to wea anything. Wow
hopefully this is a better answer for you people:
young boys were dressed in skirts until they were about 7, then they wore breeches. this was for wealthy children
aged 6-12 months babies of both wealthy and poor were swaddled completely so they could not move their limbs
poor children usually had one set of clothes, two if lucky,that were rarely washed and were basically minature versions of their parents clothes.these were made out of wool or cloth and were losse fitting. richer children's clothes were tight fitting and girls had to wear bonnets until they were 9.
they wear suits and girl wear fancy dresses.
yes poor people did wear shoes in the Tudor times
Lower class people were not allowed to wear the color purple in 1600 England due to sumptuary laws that restricted certain colors and fabrics to the nobility. Purple dye was expensive to produce and was often reserved for royalty and the upper class.
they wear clothes that we send for poor people
becase there very poor
poor and rich people went to the Globe theatre.
well poor people wear shabby torn cloths that never get washed. rich people wear suits,dresses,nice shoes,and many other things that are nice and can cost alot of money.
they wear old dirty rags that people hated
Chav clothes
ragged clothes
Fake uggs
It depends on the country, and how poor they are. Often they dress similarly to more wealthy people, but with less expensive fabrics.