He passed judgment in the case of Dred Scott, a slave who was trying to sue for his freedom on the grounds that he had been living on free soil for some years before being brought back to slave country.
Taney surprised many people by interpreting the Constitution in the spirit in which the founding fathers had meant it. So he declared that a man's property (including slave property) was sacred, and that a black man was not the sort of person who ought to be suing a white man anyway.
This delighted the South, as it appeared to mean that slavery could not be banned from any state. But it greatly offended Northern abolitionists, and drove the two sides further apart.
During that time Taney led the Supreme Court, which declared slaves to be property.
He was the Chief Justice who refused to grant freedom to a slave, on the grounds that slavery was protected by the Constitution. This delighted the South as much as it offended the Northern Abolitionists.
Roger Taney
Roger B. Taney died on 1864-10-12.
Negroes have no rights, which the white man is bound to respectJustice Taney
During that time Taney led the Supreme Court, which declared slaves to be property.
During that time Taney led the Supreme Court, which declared slaves to be property.
During that time Taney led the Supreme Court, which declared slaves to be property.
During that time Taney led the Supreme Court, which declared slaves to be property.
Taney, as chief justive of the supreme court, helped decided that slaves were property
taney as cheif justice of the supreme court helped decide that slaves were property
taney as cheif justice of the supreme court helped decide that slaves were property
He was the Chief Justice who refused to grant freedom to a slave, on the grounds that slavery was protected by the Constitution. This delighted the South as much as it offended the Northern Abolitionists.
He was the Chief Justice who refused to grant freedom to a slave, on the grounds that slavery was protected by the Constitution. This delighted the South as much as it offended the Northern Abolitionists.
The Chief Justice Roger Taney majority decision of the Dred Scott case increased tensions between people on both sides of the slavery issue. However, with that said, since the decision did not alter the status quo, and it brought forth no movement to amend the US Constitution, most Americans, not interested in the slavery issue were not interested in a case that was over ten years old. For abolitionists and pro-slavery advocates it was a decision of great importance.
He passed judgment in the case of Dred Scott, a slave who was trying to sue for his freedom on the grounds that he had been living on free soil for some years before being brought back to slave country. Taney surprised many people by interpreting the Constitution in the spirit in which the founding fathers had meant it. So he declared that a man's property (including slave property) was sacred, and that a black man was not the sort of person who ought to be suing a white man anyway. This delighted the South, as it appeared to mean that slavery could not be banned from any state. But it greatly offended Northern abolitionists, and drove the two sides further apart.
He passed judgment in the case of Dred Scott, a slave who was trying to sue for his freedom on the grounds that he had been living on free soil for some years before being brought back to slave country. Taney surprised many people by interpreting the Constitution in the spirit in which the founding fathers had meant it. So he declared that a man's property (including slave property) was sacred, and that a black man was not the sort of person who ought to be suing a white man anyway. This delighted the South, as it appeared to mean that slavery could not be banned from any state. But it greatly offended Northern abolitionists, and drove the two sides further apart.