Nobility (king, knights) Church Peasants Serf/slave
king, nobles/lords, knights, peasants, serf
serf, nobles, kings, knights!! i think! :)
No, a serf was a good deal lower than a knight. A serf was an agricultural worker who was bound to the land he lived on and was not allowed to leave it. A serf was not a slave, because he could not be purchased or sold, but he was also not free to leave the place where he lived. The knights were the lowest level of nobility. They were at a higher status than freemen, who were at a higher status than serfs.
King, Clergy, Nobles, Knights, Bourgeois, Peasant, Serf, Slaves
A serf was a person who was frequently forced to work on a plot of land,in castles etc during the medieval period when Europe practiced feudalism (war mongering). Serfs were also considered servants of the lords and or knights of the time.
the lords give the knights power
give serf land
The lords provided knights with food & land.
The lords provided knights with food & land.
The lords provided knights with food & land.
Knights were responsible for protecting the serfs and the land they lived on from invading forces. They also collected taxes and ensured order and justice within their domain. Additionally, knights may have provided some basic services and resources to the serfs in exchange for their labor on the land.