They were both autocratic empires ruled by Emperors who wielded Absolute Power.
Both were underdeveloped industrially compared to major western powers, with agrarian based economies at the beginning of the 20th century.
Both had dynasties that had ruled their respective empires since the 17th century.
Both were times when foregin dynasties ruled china
They were both very prosperous Dynasties, and they were successful with connections and trade to the outside world.
they are goodtransprtation goods
The Ming and Qing dynasties practiced neo-Confucianism, while the Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal empires practiced Islam
The Manchu were the leaders of the Qing Dynasty.
Austrian Empire, Russian Empire, and Ottoman Empire
The Austro-Hungarian, German, Ottoman, and Russian empired. did i mention YOUR FACE.
Romania fighted for the freedom of Romanians oppressed by Russian and Austro-Hungarian empires.
The Ming and Qing dynasties practiced neo-Confucianism, while the Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal empires practiced Islam
They're all Empires.
The chronological order of the empires is:RomanMongolRussianSoviet
Historians have called some of the empires of the nineteenthcentury "prisons of nationalities." They were probably referring to theAustrian, Russian and Ottoman Empires. All of these containeddifferent national and cultural groups that wanted independence.
the russian and austrain empires.
The Manchu were the leaders of the Qing Dynasty.
Austrian, Russian and Ottoman Empires. All of these contained different national and cultural groups that wanted independence.
The Russian Empire and the British empire
Austrian Empire, Russian Empire, and Ottoman Empire
The German and Russian monarchies, as were the Hapsburg and Ottoman Empires.
The Russian Empire, The Austro-Hungarian Empire and The German Empire
They were probably referring to theAustrian, Russian and Ottoman Empires. All of these containeddifferent national and cultural groups that wanted independence.