a "search and seizure" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment
Sorry, I can't provide the lyrics to "Jesus is Listening" by Slim and the Supreme Angels. However, I can summarize the song or discuss its themes if you'd like!
Krishna is the supreme all knowing lord of all beings imparting knowledge to him is foolish and unthinkable.
the job required long horseback rides ,staying in dingy inns and listening to endless debates of lawyers.
The supreme court must print its opinions so the people have record of it and can request it at any timeSo that they may be disseminated and become public knowledge.
It is Sanskrit for "awakening" or "enlightenment," as achieved by a Buddha (an awakened/enlightened person).supreme knowledge or enlightenment
abhigyan in Hindi means supreme knowledge.In Russian it means token.
No. The President is sworn in by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court (John Roberts, in this case.) Stop listening to right-wing hatemongers. They are sucking out your brain.
Knowledge Reigns Supreme Over Nearly Everyone, artist name of rapper emcee Lawrence Krisna Parker.
Yes, it is generally expected that Supreme Court justices have extensive legal knowledge and experience. They are typically chosen from candidates who have served as lower court judges, held prominent legal positions, or have had a distinguished legal career. This is to ensure that they have a deep understanding of the law and are capable of interpreting and applying it effectively.
There are ways to do it, yes, from simply using your answering machine to a hand-held tape recorder. Whether it's legal is another question, and it depends entirely upon which state you live in. It actually isn't legal, but people do it in cases of threats from a former lover, etc. Just to tape someone for no reason is illegal, but most are never caught. It's call "invasion of privacy". In many court cases even the judge will have to rule on whether a taped conversation is admissible in court. If you are phoning a lawyer or business on a complicated matter and want to tape the conversation you should legally ask that person if you can tape the conversation or not. The police can tape calls (bug) someones phone should it be warranted. Many business' use a loop hole when taping a customer. Example: If you are phoning to complain to your telephone company for poor service you will get this message, "Please acknowledge that your conversation may be taped for training purposes." This is simply a legal loop hole. On most home phones there is "speaker phone." Just push the button before you answer and you don't have to lift up the receiver. Put your tape recorder near the speaker phone (put the TV or radio down as it's interference.) Cell phones are difficult to get a clear taping from. In the US, states establish laws pertaining to the secret recording of telephone conversations or conversations in general. Conversations can be legally recorded in most states as long as one party has knowledge. Federal law also allows the personal recording of telephone and electronic communications as long as one party is aware it is occurring. States that require all party consent to a conversation being taped whether an electronic communication system or a personal encounter are, California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington State. The Supreme Court ruled that the recording of a conversation by an individual (not a government agency) is not illegal as the involved parties could not be guaranteed nor should expect privacy,meaning others could be listening on an extension and so forth. ANSWER Actually, it is really easy from a cell phone... while you are on the phone look at it, most often there is a more option, press it, and then hit record...that easy---and no one would even know.
According to the Texas Penal Code "So long as a wire, oral, or electronic communication---including the radio portion of any cordless telephone call---is not recorded for a criminal or tortious purpose, anyone who is a party to the communication, or who has the consent of a party, can lawfully record the communication and disclose its contents. Texas Penal Code § 16.02." Either party can tape an electronic conversation without the other party's consent. "Under the statute, consent is not required for the taping of a non-electronic communication uttered by a person who does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in that communication. See definition of "oral communication," Texas Code Crim. Pro. Art. 18.20." Anyone can tape a non electronic communication as long as there is not a reasonable expectation that the communication is private.
To my knowledge, there is no case pending before the Supreme Court that concerns President Obama as an individual. There are probably several cases involving President Obama in his official capacity - this is true of every President.