For military protection
Serfs just what you asked in your question. Sometimes they were referred to as villain.
because the lord promised to give them land
freeholders pay taxes . serfs work for their land
The serfs were tied to the land they lived on and farmed.
Serfs were bound to the land.Best of luck to A+Serfs are bound to the land. A+
Serfs just what you asked in your question. Sometimes they were referred to as villain.
They had to work on the lords land and swear their loyalty to him.
because the lord promised to give them land
freeholders pay taxes . serfs work for their land
Serfs were workers who were bound to the land and could not leave without permission from the landowner. This system was common in feudal societies, where serfs were tied to the land and obligated to work for the landowner in exchange for protection and the right to work the land.
The serfs were tied to the land they lived on and farmed.
False. Serfs were legally bound to a certain piece of land and obligated to work for the lord who owned that land, but they were not considered slaves as they were not owned by the lord and did have some legal rights and protections.
Serfs did not own land. In fact they were bound to the land they lived on and were not permitted to leave it.
Serfs were bound to the land.Best of luck to A+Serfs are bound to the land. A+
They reduced them to the status of serfs and allotted them to each Spartanta to work their land.
Serfs were bound to the land.Best of luck to A+Serfs are bound to the land. A+
Tsar Alexander II "freed" the serfs. He didn't free them entirely though. Serfs were bound to the land they worked on rather to the owners of the land. Alexander II had the Russian government buy some land from the owners and gave the land to the "freed" serfs in collective in each village. The serf remained bond to the land until he repaid the government the money it had paid to the owners over a 49 year period of time. A serf could leave the land but would have no land to work.