0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why did wealthy Romans live outside of the city?
Not all wealthy Romans lived outside the city. Many had a house in the city and a villa outside. The villas were either country residences for breaks from the hustle and bustle of the city, or had farms. Some rich people did live outside the city and this was no different than nowadays. There are people who prefer to live in quieter surroundings.
Who grew food for the wealthy and lived outside the city's walls in ancient Greece?
Frankinlin D. Roosevelt
Where did the wealthy live during the ancient roman empire?
Many of the Roman wealthy had villas outside Rome, as well as what today we would call condominiums or townhouses in the city. The city dwellings were usually above their places of business, with commerce taking place on the ground floor.
How did the colonist take over Boston?
Boston is/was a colonial city and was begun by the colonist who came there. So, they never "took over" the city.
Why did people live outside city walls of Jerusalem?
Those who were poor could not afford to live within the city walls. It cost a lot of money to build new city walls, so if there were housing difficulties, the poor were pushed outside.
Would you need a permit to build a large pool outside city limits?
Permits are required in every part of the country.
What was the aristocracy known as in ancient rome?
The aristocrats or nobility of ancient Rome were the patricians and the plebeians. These two classes were the ones who could trace their roots back to the families who founded the city. All the other citizens were the newcomers or the proletariat who, although wealthy and coming from respectable families outside of the city of Rome, could not do this.The aristocrats or nobility of ancient Rome were the patricians and the plebeians. These two classes were the ones who could trace their roots back to the families who founded the city. All the other citizens were the newcomers or the proletariat who, although wealthy and coming from respectable families outside of the city of Rome, could not do this.The aristocrats or nobility of ancient Rome were the patricians and the plebeians. These two classes were the ones who could trace their roots back to the families who founded the city. All the other citizens were the newcomers or the proletariat who, although wealthy and coming from respectable families outside of the city of Rome, could not do this.The aristocrats or nobility of ancient Rome were the patricians and the plebeians. These two classes were the ones who could trace their roots back to the families who founded the city. All the other citizens were the newcomers or the proletariat who, although wealthy and coming from respectable families outside of the city of Rome, could not do this.The aristocrats or nobility of ancient Rome were the patricians and the plebeians. These two classes were the ones who could trace their roots back to the families who founded the city. All the other citizens were the newcomers or the proletariat who, although wealthy and coming from respectable families outside of the city of Rome, could not do this.The aristocrats or nobility of ancient Rome were the patricians and the plebeians. These two classes were the ones who could trace their roots back to the families who founded the city. All the other citizens were the newcomers or the proletariat who, although wealthy and coming from respectable families outside of the city of Rome, could not do this.The aristocrats or nobility of ancient Rome were the patricians and the plebeians. These two classes were the ones who could trace their roots back to the families who founded the city. All the other citizens were the newcomers or the proletariat who, although wealthy and coming from respectable families outside of the city of Rome, could not do this.The aristocrats or nobility of ancient Rome were the patricians and the plebeians. These two classes were the ones who could trace their roots back to the families who founded the city. All the other citizens were the newcomers or the proletariat who, although wealthy and coming from respectable families outside of the city of Rome, could not do this.The aristocrats or nobility of ancient Rome were the patricians and the plebeians. These two classes were the ones who could trace their roots back to the families who founded the city. All the other citizens were the newcomers or the proletariat who, although wealthy and coming from respectable families outside of the city of Rome, could not do this.
Why did wealthy people go to Pompeii?
Pompeii was not a city where wealthy people went. It was an average, working, Roman town. Not to say that there were not wealthy people living in Pompeii, there were, just as in any other city, but they were generally the people who made their wealth in Pompeii and so belonged to the city's upper class. The wealthy went to the city of Herculaneum or to Stabiae or Oplontis, which were resort towns.
Where did ancient Rome senators live?
The senators in ancient Rome lived in their own houses. The was no special residential area for them. They were generally wealthy men so could afford to live in the better part of the city of Rome and also more than likely had a villa or two outside of the city.The senators in ancient Rome lived in their own houses. The was no special residential area for them. They were generally wealthy men so could afford to live in the better part of the city of Rome and also more than likely had a villa or two outside of the city.The senators in ancient Rome lived in their own houses. The was no special residential area for them. They were generally wealthy men so could afford to live in the better part of the city of Rome and also more than likely had a villa or two outside of the city.The senators in ancient Rome lived in their own houses. The was no special residential area for them. They were generally wealthy men so could afford to live in the better part of the city of Rome and also more than likely had a villa or two outside of the city.The senators in ancient Rome lived in their own houses. The was no special residential area for them. They were generally wealthy men so could afford to live in the better part of the city of Rome and also more than likely had a villa or two outside of the city.The senators in ancient Rome lived in their own houses. The was no special residential area for them. They were generally wealthy men so could afford to live in the better part of the city of Rome and also more than likely had a villa or two outside of the city.The senators in ancient Rome lived in their own houses. The was no special residential area for them. They were generally wealthy men so could afford to live in the better part of the city of Rome and also more than likely had a villa or two outside of the city.The senators in ancient Rome lived in their own houses. The was no special residential area for them. They were generally wealthy men so could afford to live in the better part of the city of Rome and also more than likely had a villa or two outside of the city.The senators in ancient Rome lived in their own houses. The was no special residential area for them. They were generally wealthy men so could afford to live in the better part of the city of Rome and also more than likely had a villa or two outside of the city.
Where was the wealthy city of Timbuktu?
West Africa
Is Sydney a wealthy country?
Yes, the country of Sydney is just as wealthy as the country of New York City.
Are Mexico city's residents wealthy?
Some of them are but the majority are not.
