In one of them a positron is emitted. In the other an electron is captured.
Since positrons are the antiparticles of electrons, it can be difficult in some cases to sort out which of these has actually occurred. Given the preponderance of electrons in normal matter, either way the net effect is going to be that an electron goes missing somewhere, either because it was "captured" or because it was annihilated when the positron ran into it.
No, a positron cannot react with a neutron in any kind of annihilation reaction. An electron and a positron can, and the same with a neutron and an anti-neutron, but it does not occur between a positron and a neutron.
Electrons being negatively charged will be attracted by the protons within the nucleus and so they come after spending energy against the force of attraction. But positron being positively charged will be repelled by positively charged portons. Hence the energy difference between electron and positron emission in case of beta decay
An electron is the carrier of the negative electrostatic force, and it has a charge of -1. Also, the electron, along with the proton and neutron, are the "basic building blocks" of atoms, and they make up the matter all around us. The positron, on the other hand, is an anti-electron - it's antimatter! And it is the antiparticle of the electron. It has a charge of +1, which is just the opposite of the electron's. The fact that the electron and positron are matter and anti-matter, and that they have a charge of -1 and +1 respectively are the major differences. A positron is an electron's anti-particle, and when the electron and positron come in contact with each other to combine, they annihilate each other in a process called electron-positron annihilation. There is a link below to that related question and to a couple of others.
A positron is the antimatter counterpart of an electron, with a positive charge, while a proton is a subatomic particle found in the nucleus of an atom, with a positive charge.
A positron is like an electron in every way but charge, electrons having -1, positrons having +1. In other words, they're a positron is an electron's antiparticle. Neutrinos are chargeless, pointlike, nearly massless particles associated with electron and positron decays that exist in order to preserve the conservation of energy, momentum and angular momentum in these decay processes.
* emisssion of electron from the surface of the metal when light of suitable frequency falls-photoelectric emission. * emision of electron from the metal by quantum tunnling of electron.
Actually 'an' up quark.The weak nuclear force permits an interaction between an up quark and an electron that converts the up quark to a down quark and the electron ceases to exist, also an interaction between a down quark and a positron that converts the down quark to an up quark and the positron ceases to exist. There are also weak nuclear force interactions that change quark types by emitting electrons or positrons. Both the absorption and emission interactions described above are referred to as Beta Decay Processes. All Beta Decay Processes also involve emission of an electron neutrino or an electron antineutrino (the lightest known particle having a nonzero mass and a particle that has almost no interaction at all with other matter).
To preserve the conservation of; energy, momentum, and angular momentum in beta plus decay. Without the neutrino there is a measurable difference between the energy, momentum, and angular momentum of the initial and final particle. The neutrino rectifies this difference and it's existence was actually postulated before it was ever discovered!
reflecttion is a part of incidentradiant but emission may be different of incident radiant.
In Bohr's model of the hydrogen atom, hydrogen's emission spectrum is produced when electrons jump between different energy levels within the atom. When an electron moves from a higher energy level to a lower one, it releases energy in the form of light, which is observed as distinct spectral lines in the emission spectrum. The energy of the emitted light corresponds to the energy difference between the initial and final energy levels of the electron.
AnswerThe difference between a proton and a positron is threefold. First, the proton is much more massive (a bit over 1800 times) than a positron. Second, the positron is an elementary particle (though it is antimatter), while the proton is made up of three elementary particles called quarks (two up quarks and one downquark). Third, the positron is antimatter while the proton is "regular" matter. Protons are stable particles (they are hydrogen-1 nuclei), and positrons are produced in positron emission (a type of radioactive decay) or in pair production (where a high energy gamma ray "splits" into an electron and a positron when passing near an atomic nucleus). After a positron appears, it will eventually (and in a relatively short period) combine with an electron in an even called mutual annihilation, and both particles will be converted into energy.Both the proton and positron have a charge of +1, and you can review more information by using the links below to the related questions about the proton and the positron.AnswerA proton is a particle found in the nucleus. It has a positive charge of +1. (Depending on how versed you are, this is equivalent to + 1.60 x 10-19 C of charge). The proton actually is comprised of three smaller subatomic particles called quarks, two up quarks (+2/3) and one down quark (- 1/3). The electron on the other hand is a fundamental particle in that it is not made up of anything smaller (that we know of yet). It has a -1 charge (again - 1.60 x 10-19 C). A positron, however, is antimatter. It is the antimatter of an electron. For intents and purposes it is an electron with a positive charge. If an electron and a positron should interact, they would annihilate one another.
Electronics is a science dealing with electrons emission electrical is a science dealing with electron flow