The courts don't allow or prohibit ANYTHING - they simply interpret the existing law. Perhaps you are referring to the US Constitutional Amendment which protects the right of Free Speech?
freedom of speech
In what ways are courts, judges, and justices shielded from politics and political pressure
It's possible, but you should do this through the courts.
It was, but that amendment has been struck down as unconstitutional by the federal courts. It used to read:"It is the policy of Oregon, and its political subdivisions, that only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid or legally recognized as a marriage."- Oregon Constitution
Royal courts
Gretchen Helmke has written: 'Courts in Latin America' -- subject(s): Judicial process, Constitutional courts, Courts of last resort, POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / General, Civil rights
Because in the courts of law, race, political beliefs, religion, even social standing does not matter. All has equal rights and justice is blind.
Courts can rule on legal questions, interpreting and applying laws to specific cases. However, political questions, which typically involve issues best resolved by the legislative or executive branches, may be deemed non-justiciable, meaning courts may refrain from ruling on them. The distinction between legal and political questions often hinges on whether the issue involves the interpretation of law or is more about policy decisions. Ultimately, the ability of courts to rule on such matters varies by jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of each case.
Byron W. Daynes has written: 'The impact of the direct election of senators on the political system' 'Intermediate appellate courts' -- subject(s): Appellate courts
The state constitution of North Carolina was amended on May 8, 2012 to prohibit same-sex marriages, civil unions and domestic partnerships. "Marriage between one man and one woman is the only domestic legal union that shall be valid or recognized in this State. This section does not prohibit a private party from entering into contracts with another private party; nor does this section prohibit courts from adjudicating the rights of private parties pursuant to such contracts." That amendment has since been struck down as unconstitutional.
A school may, through the education authority and the courts, take out an injunction to prevent someone approaching within a certain distance. The school itself cannot prohibit someone passing.
In the US Federal Court System, there are no District Courts of Appeal. The United States Courts of Appeal for various CIRCUITS review the decisions of lower DISTRICT courts. Also, judges are expected to be neutral on political issues and render decisions based upon the law and evidence presented.