The observed proportions and distribution of hydrogen and helium are consistent with what would be expected if the Big Bang model were accurate. The Big Bang model describes how, from the cooling universe, the simplest atoms would have condensed from the hot broth of fundamental particles most easily: a proton and an electron, forming hydrogen. Far fewer particles would have combined to form helium, requiring two protons and one or two neutrons. The likelihood of spontaneous condensation of elements then decreases rapidly with the complexity of the element, so very few heavier elements could have formed that way. Initially, almost all of the visible matter in the universe consisted of hydrogen and helium, according to the Big Bang model. Heavier elements would have been formed through nucleosynthesis in the cores of stars and supernovae. When we look at the proportions and distribution of the elements, especially hydrogen and helium, this is indeed what we find.
I'm going to presume the question you're asking is, "Does the ratio of hydrogen-1 to helium to deuterium to lithium support the Big Bang Theory?"
The answer is yes -- very strongly. The ratios of these isotopes to each other -- which appears to be about the same in all parts of our Universe -- are pretty much as predicted by the Big Bang. All other hypotheses are reduced to saying, "I have no idea why these isotopes are the ratios they are -- they just ARE that way, and I have no way to explain it."
The Big Bang produced hydrogen, helium, and trace amounts of lithium once the universe was cool enough for atoms to form.
Hydrogen and helium are the first elements produced in the universe after the big-bang.
3:1
The big bang produced the helium no present in the sun's core. The universe cooled down enough after the big bang to form the formation of helium and hydrogen.
Hmph. The Big Bang theory did not form the sun. The big bang formed the elements hydrogen, then hydrogen began to create helium. Then stars were formed out of these two elements and that is how our sun was created.
It wasn't. Right after the Big Bang, there was only hydrogen (including deuterium), helium, and minute amounts of lithium. Apart from that, all the so-called metals - i.e., elements other than hydrogen or helium - were created in supernovae.
The matter that came out of the Big Bang was about 90% hydrogen and 10% helium.
Hydrogen and helium are the first elements produced in the universe after the big-bang.
3:1
The big bang produced the helium no present in the sun's core. The universe cooled down enough after the big bang to form the formation of helium and hydrogen.
Hmph. The Big Bang theory did not form the sun. The big bang formed the elements hydrogen, then hydrogen began to create helium. Then stars were formed out of these two elements and that is how our sun was created.
No. The hydrogen in the universe was formed during the Big Bang. Stars consume hydrogen, fusing it into helium.
It wasn't. Right after the Big Bang, there was only hydrogen (including deuterium), helium, and minute amounts of lithium. Apart from that, all the so-called metals - i.e., elements other than hydrogen or helium - were created in supernovae.
No element "started" the big bang. The big band eventually produced mainly hydrogen and helium, which may be the answer you were looking for.
Fusion or Nuclear Fusion
Hydrogen was initially formed in the 'Big Bang' which initiated this universe. Helium is formed by the fusion of hydrogen atoms, inside stars. This reaction is what causes stars to shine, and give off heat.
Some was made in the big bang and the rest is made by the process of hydrogen fusion in the cores of stars.
The big bang ... more than three quarters of all original atoms were hydrogen (the rest were helium, deuterium, and (traces of) Lithium).