grow stuff
shut yer hole
They did work
Peasants gave their daimyo a portion of their agricultural produce as a form of tax or tribute in return for protection and the right to work the land. This system of land tenure was central to the feudal structure in Japan, where peasants relied on their daimyo for security and governance. In addition to produce, peasants might also provide labor for various projects or military service when required. This reciprocal relationship helped maintain social order and economic stability in feudal Japan.
Japan forced the Portuguese out because of their participation of revolt by persecuted peasants and Christians in 1637 known as the Shimabara Rebellion. The rebellion was crushed at a high cost to the shogun's army.
from lowest to highest (in respect/prestige): merchant, artisan, peasants, aristocracy (included samurai and bureaucrats)
During the Shogun era in Japan, the Emperor held a largely symbolic and religious role, while real political power was wielded by the shogunate. This meant that peasants were primarily affected by the local daimyōs (feudal lords) and the shogun's policies rather than by the Emperor directly. While the Emperor's authority was acknowledged, the shogunate's governance dictated the peasants' lives through taxation, labor obligations, and agricultural practices. Consequently, the Emperor's influence on peasants was minimal, as their daily realities were shaped by the feudal hierarchy and local governance.
Europe and Japan were both feudal societies. Feudal systems contain hierarchies. The hierarchies in Japan and Europe were similar: king/emperor on the top, nobles next, then knights/samurai, then merchants and craftsmen, and lastly, peasants and serfs.
That's an interesting question. Feudal Japan had a more formalized and ritualized kind of culture than feudal Europe did; elaborate rules of courtesy applied at all levels of society, whereas European peasants were pretty crude for the most part. In both societies there was a unifying religious principle, which in Europe was Christianity and the authority of the Church, and in Japan was shintoism and the authority of the Emperor. In both cases, a social hierarchy attempted, with considerable success, to control everyone's lives; everyone owed their fealty to someone, except for the kings in Europe or the Emperor in Japan, who didn't owe loyalty to anyone, since there was no higher authority (at least, not counting deities). Both societies had similar types of weaponry (European armor was considerably tougher) and skilled swordsmen were much to be feared and respected. In the lower classes, life was cheap. Neither society had any concept of human rights; only the nobility had rights.
It went emperor, figurehead, daimyo, samurai (warriors), and then peasants (poor, normal people). Imagine a pyramid.
In feudal Japan, peasants were considered higher than merchants on the social pyramid primarily due to their essential role in agriculture, which was the backbone of the economy and society. Peasants produced food and supported the samurai class, who provided protection and governance. In contrast, merchants were often viewed with suspicion as their wealth was seen as derived from profit rather than contribution to society. This perception reinforced the hierarchy that prioritized the agrarian lifestyle over commerce.
The social pyramid in feudal Japan was structured hierarchically, with the emperor at the top, though he held little actual power. Below him were the shogun and the daimyo, powerful lords who controlled land and samurai warriors. The samurai, skilled warriors, occupied the next level, serving the daimyo. At the base of the pyramid were peasants, artisans, and merchants, with peasants forming the largest group, as they were essential for agricultural production.
Peasants!The peasants are revolting!-Yes, but what are the peasants doing?Street beggars are often unsuccessful in their attempts to beg from peasants.