0
do you mean Polynucleotide?
eg.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polynucleotide
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Did cells form or were they created?
A creationist viewCells were created by God. They could not have formed millions of years ago. I know, everyone thought Miller's experiment proved that they could have formed, but later it was proved wrong. Later, scientists found that, in "early earth", there was not the chemicals they Miller used; they found more accurate ones. They redid his experiment and found that no amino acids formed. But even if "back then" amino acids formed, they could never make a cell. Plus, amino acids can be destroyed easily be heat. Apparently, there was a lot of heat "back then."The four main chemicals of a cell are amino acids, lipids, porphyrins, and polynuceotides. To form, amino acids need and oxygen-free environment to form, while porpyrins need oxygen. Lipids can only be make from organtic matter, which means it can only come from living things. But even if they could all form, they could never make a cell. In fact, chemicals have been found in a cell that, anywhere else, would harm or destroy another chemical in the cell that is vital.Experiments were preformed again and again. One time, a scientist conducted an experiment. He placed a single cell in the most perfect environment it could ever have. The cell have all of its parts and was functioning properly. Then, the scientist poked the cell with a special unique device and watched under a microscope literally everything in that cell spill out. Now, he had all the parts of a cell in the most perfectly perfect environment possible. But, though everything was in the right condition, it never became a cell.Please understand my logic. Even if one of these steps happened, a thousand more would destroy it! God created cells; that's the only way one could ever come into being! As you can see from all these facts, one couldn't have possibly formed. So how did they come into being? A creator, The Creator, had to have created them.A Biologist's AnswerThe answer above is saying here that science does not explain the cell so god must have created the cell.The Miller-Urey experiment had nothing to do with the formation of cells but was an experiment in seeing if certain conditions would produce organic molecules. Other experiments have been carried out. Many other conditions were set for experimental purposes and some yielded more amino acid precursors than the Miller experiment. All yielded something organic.The creationist answer shows incomplete molecular biology information. Cell compartmentalization and membrane and vesicle bound separation of reagents allow the co-existence of chemicals that might otherwise be incompatible.The creationist answer states that a cell damaged in an experiment could not be reassembled again. This tells us nothing about cell formation. A law of physics explains the one directionality of this experiment. Do you expect a scrambled egg to reform as an egg regardless of the " perfect " environment?The creationist answer sets out many reasons why a cell could only formed by a creator but offers no supporting evidence. The claims are therefore based on faith rather than science. Even if not one scintilla of evidence supported the scientific explanations of cell evolution it does not follow that the creation answer is true by default.
