answersLogoWhite

0

In many or most cases scientists publish their results in sequences of papers, rather than in one big results paper. So, after one of them publishes a set of results they go on to produce more results or to write up or refine other results that they already have.

Eventually, they move on to investigating some related aspect of the same question, or to a different question entirely.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What do scientists do with their results after an investigation?

Results get published.


How do scientists usually communicate and defend the result of an investigation?

How do scientists usually communicate and defend the results of an investigation


What communicating results of an investigation allow other scientists do?

Review evidence


Why do scientist share information?

It is important for scientists to communicate to others not only the results of the investigation, but also the methods by which the investigation was done.


How can a person judge if the results of a scientific investigation are true?

as man other scientists do, try the experiment again and compare results


Why do scientists follow a set of steps when carrying out a scientific investigation?

To ensure reliable and repeatable observations and results


Why do scientists follow a set order when carrying out a scientific investigation?

To ensure reliable and repeatable observations and results


Why do scientists follow a set of order of steps when carrying out a scientific investigation?

To ensure reliable and repeatable observations and results


Why do scientists follow a set order of steps of when carrying out a scientific investigation?

To ensure reliable and repeatable observations and results


Why scientists follow a set order of steps when carrying out a scientific investigation?

To ensure reliable and repeatable observations and results


Why do scientists follow a set order of step when carrying out a scientific investigation?

To ensure reliable and repeatable observations and results


What happens when other scientists achieve different results when repeating an investigation?

They will need to keep redoing it until everyone has the same answer