They try to come up with a better one.
Someone answer this
Someone answer this
If the data shows that a model is wrong, scientists will revise the model or develop a new one that better fits the observed data. They may also investigate the sources of error or uncertainty in the data and make adjustments accordingly. The scientific process involves constant refinement and improvement, so scientists are open to modifying their models based on new evidence.
because they were proved wrong by other scientists.
Killing frogs in massive numbers just to show something that can easily be shown with a computer model is senseless and wrong. you can just get online and they have tons of things you can disect. its wrong to kill innocent frogs that did nothing to you.
based on observation of what is wrong with the work of other scientists
NOT wrong in moderation. But then in moderation it wouldn't be called HOARDING. It's wrong only if it can be shown to be PATHOLOGICAL.
they do experiments and invent new things
all the scientists are wrong every time,it was supposed to end 2012 1999 999ad and 2011 may everything is wrong if you are scaring people stop!.
Niels Bohr developed the model of the atom shown in the image. He proposed the planetary model of the atom, where electrons orbit the nucleus in fixed energy levels.
They determine what they did wrong, and try again.
Flat model