If an experiment does not confirm his hypothesis, the scientist should report this honestly. Even if the results confirmed the hypothesis, further testing should be done by him or others to gather more data.
when scientist find out if their awnser is correct or incorrect they usually check over their awnser andstate if it is correct or not.
Redo it
You have to present the facts backing it up. Any experiments or statistics have to be able to be replicated by someone else in the same conditions for it to be true.
one
Hopefully the publish their negative results.
To verify whether or not laboratory conditions are necessary to recreate the results. If the same experiment produces the same results in different environments, then the scientist knows that the results are sound. However, if the results are different in different places, then it may be an environmental factor of the laboratory that is affecting the outcome. Repeating the experiment in different environments allows scientists to either confirm or rule out this possibility.
A hypothesis can be framed in either a positive or negative manner. The results will show that this WILL occur. The results will show that this WILL NOT occur.
You have to present the facts backing it up. Any experiments or statistics have to be able to be replicated by someone else in the same conditions for it to be true.
one
The Hypothesis is a Question of " What If?". Experiments are performed to show what actually happens.
Hopefully the publish their negative results.
Newton did experiments using prisms to show that white light contained all colours of light.
It is not Hershey and Chase !! It is Oswald Avery that conducted these experiments!
scientists run experiments. That is the basis of all a scientist does.
It is not Hershey and Chase !! It is Oswald Avery that conducted these experiments!
What did Dalton's experiments show
The future nergasm!
Yes. But usually a hypothesis (if, then, because statement) is changed overtime to establish a conclusion on the investigation. The point of the collection of the data is to show whether or not the hypothesis was supported, and if not needs to be corrected/modified. Certain parts may still be helpful/kept but in most cases it is changed
Observation of the process in nature. Google ring species. The erection of testable hypothesis. The experimental testing of these hypothesis. Google Lenski and the E. Coli experiment. Repeatability and analogous experiments. Google artificial selection. Falsifiability. A way to show the hypothesis can be rejected. Fossil bunnies in the pre-Cambrian.