Want this question answered?
It's compressed.
You say that something is a matter when there is mass and occupies space.
The word "via" is latin for "by way of". To say something traveled via air waves is to say that something was broadcast by radio.
A net force will cause an acceleration. That is to say, if a net force acts on an object, the object's velocity will change.
If that "something" you are reffering to is matter, then no, this will not be possible. It is against the very fundamentals of physics...Matter is something which has mass AND occupies space. If this were the case, that something would have mass and not occupy space.. its density would be round about infinity. A black hole is the closest to what you might be wanting to hear. It has a mass, and has a space that is no smaller than a teaspoon. Energy does not come in to this. The simple reason because it has its own quantity so we can not possibly imagine to find the *mass* and *space* of the form of energy, say heat. I hope this helped.Sincerely, Kenny.
It's compressed.
To float in air is to leave the ground. As the atmosphere stretches from the ground to the edge of space, I would say we were submerged in air.
Yes, it would. If you are standing in the room, you are taking up space that is not all air.
The density of the gases in space is so low that we would not term them "air". As you increase in altitude from Sea Level the density of air gradually decreases right up until you reach space. There is no point where there is a sudden change so that someone can say that air has stopped and space has begun. Quite simply, the upper reaches of the atmosphere have been defined by picking an altitude. Below that altitude is "air"; above it is "space".
If space exist as we were so diligently taught in school and scientist say there is no air in space how the hell does a flag wave with no air no atmosphere and no wind sorry it was faked.
This is called candleing, you dont do this to see the duckling, you do this to measure the air space at the tip of the egg. the closer the egg gets to hatching, the bigger that air space should be.
I live beer Washington and I would have to say the most fun thing to do is the air and space museum
It is better to say that it is because there is no air of any sort in space. Any gas can carry sound, it is not a special property of oxygen or carbon dioxide.
there is no air in space so humans can't breath there if there was air the space would have been colorful because air reflects light.no one can hear us say anything in space because sound travels through air at a top speed of 340-350 meters per second and there is no air in space.there is no air there is no life.So when astronomers reach space they have to take oxygen masks with them so they can breath. the amount of gases in air: oxygen=21% nitrogen=79% other gases=1%
To answer that, we have to agree on where space starts; then we can say how far away that is.Let's say that space starts where the air is so thin that a satellite can stay in orbit, withoutslowing down enough to fall down to earth.That's about 160 miles straight up from where you are right now. Everything farther than that is 'space'.
space is nothing but if yo say space not the background there would be stars, the sun and well other stuff and if your thinking if a fish can live underwater without brething air is it possible for a fish to live in space cause if ya thinking yes BEEP!rong answer it isno
"Nature Abhors a vacuum," proclaimed Aristotle. And he was right, at least as far as sucking through straws is concerned. Air is a gas, a combination of carbon dioxide and oxygen, amongst other compounds. As a gas, its form is mutable and expands to fill the available space. It exists both outside and inside the straw. By sucking through the straw, one lowers the pressure within it so that the air pressure on the outside is greater than that on the inside. The outside pressure acts upon, say, the liquid in the cup, and it flows into the straw to replace the diminishing air pressure within. The act of drawing the air out of the straw causes the liquid to enter it. Thus, the liquid is sucked up the straw due to that initiating act (i.e. the liquid is pulled, not pushed, up the straw). Alas, the answer to your question is: no. It is not more accurate to say the liquid is pushed up the straw rather than sucked up, however, the accuracy of either statement itself leaves much to be desired.