0
Impartiality
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
The policy of taking neither side in a conflict?
Neutrality
Taking neither side?
Would be maintaining neutrality
When neither side is able to make significant gains during a conflict?
Stalemate.
What were two causes of stalement in the west?
Stalement-A situation in which neither side in An conflict is able to gain the advantage.
Which of these accurately represents the outcome of the Korean War?
neither side won the conflict which was ended with an armistice in july 1953
What was the outcome of the conflict along the east coast early in the civil war?
Neither side could gain a clear and decisive victory.
What do you call information put out to support a side in conflict?
This is called propaganda. Propaganda can also be used to portray an opposing side in a negative light.
If your taking Viagra and drank a redbull are there any type of side affects?
If you call the best sex ever a side effect, then yes.
Which post-World War 2 conflict ended with neither side winning?
The Korean conflict (1950-53). It has been nicknamed "the war that never ended" because there has yet been no reconcilliation between North Korea and South Korea.
What was the policy of taking neither side in the Cold War known as?
Nonalignment, that is, not allied to either side in the Cold War. India, which blended a democratic government with a socialist economy, was a leader in the nonaligned movement.
Did India and Pakistan agree to partition Kashmir?
Presently, the conflict and debates between Pakistan and India concerning the partition of Kashmir still continues with neither side agreeing to anything.
What is the position when a country supports neither side in a conflict?
That is called "neutrality". Sometimes the neutrality is respected by the warring countries (Switzerland in World War II) and sometimes it is not (The Netherlands in World War II).
