answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Engineering

What is the opposite of inventor?

destructor


Can you overload destructor for your class?

No. Classes can only have one destructor, whether you define one yourself or allow the compiler to generate one for you. The compiler-generated destructor is public by default, does not release any memory allocated to any class' member pointers, and is non-virtual, which are the three main reasons for defining your own.


What is issue in throwing an exception in a destructor?

If a destructor throws an exception, the instance is left in an invalid state. When an exception is thrown, the destructor automatically terminates at the point of the throw, unwinding the call stack until an exception handler is found (if one is provided). However, any resources yet to be released by the destructor, including all the instance's base classes, cannot be destroyed. When writing your own destructors, it is important to never throw an exception. If an exception could be thrown from within your destructor, you must catch it and handle it within the same destructor -- you must not rethrow the exception.


What is the difference between destructors in c plus plus and c sharp?

In C# only class instances can have a destructor, whereas both class and struct instances can have a destructor in C++. While syntactically similar, a C++ destructor executes exactly as written, whereas a C# destructor merely provides the body of the try clause of the class' finalize method.


How do you write a C plus plus program for destructor?

Class destructors define operations that will be performed whenever an object of the class falls from scope. This usually involves manually releasing any resources allocated to the object. However, by using resource handles or smart pointers, all resources will be released automatically, thus there is no need to define a destructor. The only time we really need to define a destructor is when the class is intended to be used as a polymorphic base class (has one or more virtual methods) but does not inherit a virtual destructor, in which case we must define a virtual destructor. Classes that do define or inherit a virtual destructor cannot be used polymorphically. However, by using resource handles or smart pointers to manage resources, the destructor body can be left empty. The only reason for declaring the destructor at all is simply to declare it virtual because all methods are non-virtual by default -- unless they override a virtual method of the base class (in which case they can simply be declared as overrides). The only time we need to define a non-empty destructor body is when implementing a resource handle or smart pointers, however the standard library already provides efficient implementations so, other than for educational purposes, there is no need to define our own resource handles.

Related Questions

When was Varroa destructor created?

Varroa destructor was created in 2000.


What does the tilde key in a web address mean?

its destructor sign:means to space empty for new objects


What is l drago destructor ultimate move?

Dragon Emperor Life Destructor.


What is the opposite of inventor?

destructor


What does instructor rhyme with?

Destructor


What actors and actresses appeared in El destructor - 1985?

The cast of El destructor - 1985 includes: Eduardo Palomo


Can you overload destructor for your class?

No. Classes can only have one destructor, whether you define one yourself or allow the compiler to generate one for you. The compiler-generated destructor is public by default, does not release any memory allocated to any class' member pointers, and is non-virtual, which are the three main reasons for defining your own.


Can you declare a Destructor as Private?

No .... Whats the point of declaring destructor as a private when it is supposed to be designed to free the memory after executing a program or a method ???


What is issue in throwing an exception in a destructor?

If a destructor throws an exception, the instance is left in an invalid state. When an exception is thrown, the destructor automatically terminates at the point of the throw, unwinding the call stack until an exception handler is found (if one is provided). However, any resources yet to be released by the destructor, including all the instance's base classes, cannot be destroyed. When writing your own destructors, it is important to never throw an exception. If an exception could be thrown from within your destructor, you must catch it and handle it within the same destructor -- you must not rethrow the exception.


What is the difference between destructors in c plus plus and c sharp?

In C# only class instances can have a destructor, whereas both class and struct instances can have a destructor in C++. While syntactically similar, a C++ destructor executes exactly as written, whereas a C# destructor merely provides the body of the try clause of the class' finalize method.


Is destructor a verb?

Destructor is a noun - a furnace for disposal of refuse. In this example it is the act or process of intentional destruction; The verb form would be to destroy or to be destroyed


Constructor and destructor invocation in c?

Not possible in C.