0
I take 0.00 to mean "zero dollars"
The word "all" is repeated four times, so it would be "for all"
Since "zero dollars" basically means "free", the answer is:
Free for all.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Olivia Wong
I'll stick with foc
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
The mean of 6 000 000 000 000 000 000 000?
The mean of one number is itself.
What is the standard form of 10 000 000 000 000 000?
If you mean as in scientific notation then it is: 1.0*10^16
How much is a billion in England?
The English use is for a billion to mean 1 000 000 000 000 but this is going out-of-date. While this was common fifty years ago, most people in England now use the American usage and mean 1 000 000 000
What does 000 mean in judaism?
Nothing. 000 = 0 = nothing.
How do you write 8 000 000?
If you mean 8,000,000 then it is eight milllion
How many moles in a googol?
Do you mean google because google is 2 but it is A Mole = 6.02x1023 Googol = 1x10100 10 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 Divided by 602 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 Equals 16 611 295.681 Approximately thanks for using my strategy.
What is a decillion?
1 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 A number with 33 zeroes after it. to put it in retrospect. all of bill gates money times 3 trillion
What does 10B mean in money?
10 billions: 10 000 000 000 000 (1 bilion=12 zeroes) Sources: My mind
Is 17.5 million the same as 17500 million and 175 Billion?
no not at all. 17 500 000 is not the same as 17 500 000 000 and 175 000 000 000
What is 1 followed by 33 zeros?
A very large number: 10331 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000If it indeed does have aname not many would recognize it!The largeest standard prefix is yotta which represents 1024 only a billionth of your 1033 All the bits in all the computer memory in the worls dosent come close to a yottabyte!
Where did they get the name Google?
I think that Google got their name from the number googol; which would be 10 to the power of 100, or 10 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000. Being known for their search engine above all else this would probably be their choice as to say "we have millions apon millions of site in our search". Also their headquarters is called the googleplex; a play on the word googolplex; A googolplex is the number one followed by one googol zeros. Basically... its based around the number 10 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 being a googol.
What were the human costs of World War 2 with particular attention to the civilian and military losses in Russia Germany Britain United States China and Japan?
Hello John, It is usually stated that around 56 000 000 people died in the war (i.e. because of the war), of which around 25 000 000 were combattants. This at least according to the "official" list published by the UN. It is of course impossible to get any precision in these figures. Remember, these figures do not include the Holocaust, nor the Soviet purges or any other nationally domestic killing that took place during the war. It counts only people killed by other nations than their own. In terms of nation list, there is a UN such as well. It lists only the dead, not wounded/maimed/missing. Numbers could not be had from all nations, and all nations used very approximate figures. Nations such as Finland; Norway and USA did lose civilians, as did others not listed at all (Denmark e.g.), and the Baltic countries lost combattants, but all either unknown or too few to list (less than 10 000 were not taken up on the list). So in terms of "human cost", it tells perhaps half a truth. But here it is anyway; USA 220 000 (all combattants) Australia 30 000 (all combattants) Belgium 60 000 (10 000 combattants) Britain 430 000 (370 000 combattants) Bulgaria 10 000 (all combattants) Estonia 140 000 (all civilians) Finland 90 000 (all combattants) France 520 000 (250 000 combattants) Greece 100 000 (20 000 combattants) Yugoslavia 1 600 000 (300 000 combattants) China 13 500 000 (3 500 000 combattants) Lithuania 120 000 (all civilians) Netherlands 135 000 (23 000 combattants) Norwegians 10 000 (all combattants) New Zeeland 10 000 (all combattants) Poland 2 620 000 (120 000 combattants) Romania 240 000 (200 000 combattants) USSR 18 600 000 (13 600 000 combattants) Czechoslovakia 90 000 (20 000 combattants) Hungary 200 000 (120 000 combattants) Austria 270 000 (230 000 combattants) Italy 400 000 (330 000 combattants) Japan 2 060 000 (1 700 000 combattants) Germany 6 890 000 (3 250 000 combattants) Hope that enlightens a bit. But as I said, for a total human cost you need to add a whole lot of people to these lists. Germany alone had over 7 000 000 wounded, many of whom were scarred for life. The USA listed 670 000 WIA, the Brits 320 000 wounded (not all in action, as it includes civilians), France 400 000, the USSR 14 000 000 and so on. Sincerely Tommy
