- Christianity looks down on cloning as man then tries to be equal with god.
- I prefer to think that God endowed us with intelligence and supplied us with a moral imperative to use that intelligence wisely.
Christianity per se does not express an opinion on anything of which its writers were unaware. It simply attempts to promote the general moral and ethical guidelines that are couched in the framework of Jesus' ministry. It is the responsibility of Christian denominational leaders, such as the Pope, to interpret current developments through that moral and ethical framework and to issue guidance accordingly.
Now, Christianity holds that life is the gift of God and that all living things are to be held as precious and unique. So, broadly speaking, the Pope considers that cloning reduces the value of life by reducing that uniqueness and preciousness; and by reducing it to the level of a commodity, and thereby he denounces it. Specifically he has recently commented upon the proposed technique of cloning human beings to provide organs for transplantation. he sees this as doing a terrible thing for a good reasons and expresses his preference for stem cell engineering as a technique to this end.
His words are a matter of public record if you require the details.
what does Christianity say to animal cloning
I think cloning research shouldn't be regulated because cloning can be harmful to the world. Also cloning can have advantages and some disadvantages.
Cloning of animals is legal, but cloning of humans is considered to be a taboo and is not legal.
Cloning is beneficial when an animal species or other organism species is becoming extinct. By cloning them, there will be more of them now, and enough of them to reproduce and naturally restore the population.
Cloning will affect how we think about humanity, and will also affect daily life in countless ways.
i think it can
What I think is that fusion cell cloning is when an empty ovum has any sort of cell fused into it by a mild electric shock, while adult cell cloning is only when a sperm is taken from an adult cell is fused into the empty ovum.
How do you think they were born themselves? Cloning? I dont think so, you need to be careful at first...
Geneticists have varying opinions on cloning. Some see its potential for medical and agricultural advancements, while others express ethical concerns about the implications of cloning on individual identity and rights. Overall, the scientific community stresses the importance of strict regulations and ethical considerations when exploring cloning technologies.
Human cloning and animal cloning both involve creating a genetic copy of an organism, but there are differences in the ethical and legal considerations surrounding each. Human cloning raises complex ethical issues related to human rights and medical ethics, while animal cloning is primarily focused on agricultural and scientific applications. Additionally, the technologies and procedures used for human cloning may differ from those used for animal cloning.
Opinions on cloning vary among people. Some see it as a scientific advancement with the potential to benefit society by helping in medical research and organ transplantation. Others have ethical concerns about the implications of human cloning and the potential for misuse.
Many people have a personal opinion on cloning. Most people do not think it is a good idea and there has even been a bill known as the Human Cloning prohibition Act made to Congress but was rejected. It was re-introduced again in May 2013.