Want this question answered?
Plutarch simply tells the story from his research. He, like other ancient writers considered Cleopatra to be a sly manipulator, out to achieve her ends no matter what the cost. Antony is considered to have redeemed his honor by having a "noble" death.
Mr. Stone would be very disappointed !
The origin of this quote is somewhat disputed. The discrepancy appears to originate from a 1929 publication of the Reader's Digest, which describes the quote ambiguously as a lament on his father's victories, or that Alexander's empire was so large (and spanned most of the civilized world at the time). Some sites attribute this quote as Alexander's last words, but without documentation. A further possibility is that this is a misquotation from Plutarch's Tranquility of the Mind, quoted below."Such contentedness and change of view in regard to every kind of life does the infusion of reason bring about. When Alexander heard from Anaxarchus of the infinite number of worlds, he wept, and when his friends asked him what was the matter, he replied, 'Is it not a matter for tears that, when the number of worlds is infinite, I have not conquered one?'"
a base view is a view on autodesk inventor and it is the first view that you start with before you project it.
Plutach tried to describe a factual history, but he wrote it some 400 years after Alexander's reign and so you could hardly call him an eyewitness. It is also uncertain what exact source material he had available and how accurate and contemporary that was. What we do know is that he modelled Alexander's character much on that of Julius Caesar, whom he admired. Modern historians have doubts on several points of fact in Plutarchus' account, but it is the only detailed history of Alexander we have and there is supporting evidence for much of what he writes.The Book of Arda Viraf was written even more than 700 years after that of Plutarch and it is not even an attempt at factual history writing, but "the dream-journey of a devout Zoroastrian" called Wiraz (or Viraz, or Wiraf) who very probably was not even a real person. If we have doubts about the amount of hard evidence at the basis of Plutarch's history, we can at least double or triple those doubts for the Book of Arda Viraf written some one thousand years after Alexander's exploits. Alexander stands there accused of "destroying" Persia and its culture but that is certainly incorrect. Alexander loved the Persian culture and the trappings of the Oriental veneration for its monarch, which he now came to enjoy. The scriptures that he is said to have destroyed only came in written form long after his death and until then, were only oral history.But regardless of the book's very shaky factual foundation, it represents a Persian point of view that was in consequence hostile to Alexander. Plutarch also had the disadvantage of writing long after Alexander lived (and he did also admire him) but in all probability his acces to Greek and Macedonian source material was infinitely better than that of the writer of the Book of Arda.
It is not known how Plutarch seen Gd in parallel lives. This was always a mystery.
The SWOT analysis of Australia shows the country's "Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats." It is an overall view of Australia's financial position.
The Greeks viewed their gods as omnipotent and omnipresent, much as Christians view their god. Kronos had no specific strengths or weaknesses, though he was slave to the same passions, fears and vices that any human would be. You see mankind was made in the image of the gods, so the gods must feel emotion and act on it the way people would.
He agreed with their points of view.
In my view the exploration of virtue in Plutachs parallel lives and the moralistic tone of the narrative seems to suggest that Plutarch belived that the attainment of virtue was the purpose of life.
Plutarch simply tells the story from his research. He, like other ancient writers considered Cleopatra to be a sly manipulator, out to achieve her ends no matter what the cost. Antony is considered to have redeemed his honor by having a "noble" death.
Admit and talk about the weaknesses in a point of view
Acknowledge and address the weaknesses of your point of view
Acknowledge and address the weaknesses of your point of view
Admit and talk about the weaknesses in a point of view
Admit and talk about the weaknesses in a point of view
Not at all. The narrator seeks to hold a neutral view, viewing neither as purposefully good nor bad, but as people who's weaknesses and strengths affect them and others in many ways, both good and bad.