0
YOuth Criminal Justice Act
What else can I help you with?
What does the YCJA stand for?
YOuth Criminal Justice Act
What are the disadvantages of the ycja?
One of the disadvantages of the YCJA (Youth Criminal Justice Act) is that it protects the rights of the young offender instead of the rights of protection for the society.
Why wouldn't they give enough punishments ycja?
because the court law has the rights
What acts came before the ycja?
Prior to the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA), the Young Offenders Act (YOA) was in place in Canada. The YOA was in force from 1984 to 2003, and emphasized the rehabilitation and reintegration of young offenders back into society.
Does it cost or save money using the ycja?
The Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) aims to balance accountability and rehabilitation for young offenders. While implementing the YCJA can involve initial costs for services and programming tailored to youth, studies have shown that diverting young offenders from the adult justice system can save money in the long run by reducing future criminal activity and associated costs.
How effective is the ycja?
The Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) in Canada has been effective in promoting rehabilitation over punishment for young offenders. It emphasizes community-based solutions and aims to reduce recidivism by addressing the underlying issues that contribute to criminal behavior. While it has led to a decrease in youth incarceration rates, some critics argue that its implementation may vary regionally, affecting overall effectiveness. Overall, the YCJA represents a shift towards a more restorative approach in youth justice.
What do you think of the ycja?
i think it is good but it could be a little more harder on youths like im a teen and thats my perspective
What is the purpose of ycja?
The Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) in Canada aims to address youth crime while emphasizing rehabilitation and reintegration rather than punishment. It provides a legal framework for dealing with young offenders aged 12 to 17, promoting accountability while considering their developmental needs. The YCJA seeks to balance the interests of society with the rights of youth, encouraging measures that prevent crime and support positive outcomes. Overall, its purpose is to foster a justice system that recognizes the unique circumstances of young individuals.
If you are caught by the police when you have a doctors appointment skipping school does it go on your permenent record even if you have a doctors note?
If you are under the age of 14 it will not go on your permanent record and the YCJA will protect your rights as a youth offender. You can't even have a permanent record if you are under the age of 14 unless the crime is severe. The YCJA will make sure that your privacy on this matter will be kept private.
Do canadains think the ycja is to harsh?
some do and other don't. theres 2 sides. some would say yes because sentences are not as harsh as they should be for offenders that broke the law more than once. and still their names are not published because they are minors. what if there is a 16 year old murderer in your community wouldn't you want to know their name? the YCJA law predicts the media from releasing the minor's name. only if the media gets an adult's consent they can, which wont happen too often some say it good because it reintegrates the young person in the community by not publishing the name, or the youth gets a second chance and doesnt get sent to court if the offence is not serious. also the YCJA addresses the root causes, which means they look into the young person's home to see what might cause him to do something like that
Is the YCJA fair and equitable?
The YCJ isn't fair and equitable because youths of all ages up to age 18 are treated the same. Thier names are protected by the law, but they may be a threat to the community. They need to be treated more harshly.
What two changes to the YCJA were proposed in February 2007?
In February 2007, two changes to the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) were proposed in Canada. The first proposed change was to increase the maximum sentence for youth convicted of first-degree murder to 10 years. The second proposed change was to allow judges to consider adult sentences for youth convicted of serious violent offenses.
