It eats the yolk in the egg
In the context of evolution, the egg came first. The development of hard shells around eggs allowed for animals to lay them outside the body, protecting and nourishing the embryo inside. This evolutionary adaptation predates the existence of chickens as we know them today.
i think the egg came first you don't necessarily need a chicken to have an egg it could be a hybrid egg that would hatch to be a chicken thus the egg is first
21 days are needed to out of -chicken from egg in hatchery.
A chicken and some chicken feed
The female is fertilised by the male before the egg is laid.
the egg came first because where are you going to get the chicken if their is no egg... you can't get a chicken out of thin air ...you need a egg to get the first chicken.... then that chicken lays a egg ...then that one does , then the next and so on...the earth's matter made up the first egg....kill the first chicken...you'll still have a egg to get another chicken...kill the first egg.... chickens would cease to ''egg-sist''(exsist).The egg came first from another animal that adapted into the chicken. Kind of like how humans came from monkeys.
a chicken need a rooster to fertilize it's sex cell whatever it is A chicken can lay an egg without a rooster but the egg can never be hatched. If the egg is fertilized then the egg is able to hatch.
You do not need a cock to get an egg from a chicken. If you want to have fertilized eggs that will hatch into chicks there has to be a cock.
a person scared it and it got to egg-cited
a chicken egg is about 50g :)
yes because the chicken is inside of the egg.if the chicken wasnt it would be called just an egg
dude, i think the answer is pretty obvious. the chicken came first. i am a christian, and i think The Lord God would create a chicken, not an egg to become the first chicken. imagine an egg without a mother to raise it. so go rub it in your buddies' faces that you know the answer to the ancient chicken and egg riddle.