help
It means that someone (probably the losing party) petitioned the court to have the case re-opened and the original judgment re-considered. A hearing on the matter was conducted by the judge - and after hearing arguments for and against, the motion was DENIED.
File a motion with the Clerk of The Court requesting a hearing on this. see links
when you receive a notice of hearing setting a motion and you also want to set that same motion.
Once a judge rule to hear a motion at the preliminary hearing stage, can the states attorney acquire an indictment before the judge rule on the motion that was set for a hearing date?
You draft a Motion for Bond and Motion for an Emergency Hearing. You file it with the appropriate clerk of court and serve it on the appropriate parties. Then you contact the Judge's staff and request that it be set down for a hearing.
The last formal hearing immediately before the jury trial... is likely to be the prelimanary hearing, unless your attorney starts bombarding the court with motion hearings and requests for pre-trial release.
It means that a motion (a legal request to the court) has been made to ask the judge to release some kind of records. The judge can either grant or deny the request (motion).
I am unfamiliar with the term "clarification" hearing. However, any hearing must begin with a motion presented to the court requesting the hearing. File a motion with the Clerk of the Court's office setting forth the reason for the request and it will be forwarded to a judge (or in the case of a specific case, a particular judge) who will either grant or deny the hearing.
It is a motion for a hearing to suppress a witness' identification of during a line up or show up.
If I am understanding the question correctly - no motion is necessary or required to request the judge to move forward with the hearing. It is ALWAYS the court's intention to move a hearing forward. Unless the judge dismisses the case for some legal reasong, court hearings will automatically go forward unless a motion to drop or stop the hearing is presented on which he must rule.
A Cross-Notice is generally sent from one party in a legal dispute to the other party. It notifies them that an original Hearing will ALSO include another matter. For example - in Family Court, you may have a Hearing for Child Support and a Hearing based on a Motion for Contempt (your ex failed to comply with the last agreement). You have filed Discovery documents for the child support related part but your ex hasn't produced the documents you requested - so you filed a Motion to Compel Discovery - but the courts haven't ruled on it and you need the documents. You would file a Cross-Notice of Hearing to identify that you plan to take up the matter of the Motion to Compel Discovery during the Motion for Contempt Hearing so you can have the documents you need for the Child Support Hearing (assuming it occurs later).
From the time of your hearing I believe the "hearing officer" has 30 days to issue a decision (if they did not do it at the time of the hearing).