One-dimensional motion is motion in a straight line.
I would say that it might be like switching from one form of reality into another. Like from one dimension to another. To oscillate from one dimension to another. To switch. Like you would press a button on a remote control to change a television channel to another one. You would oscillate/switch from one to another.
You didn't say which meaning of the word you want to use. If you mean the measured dimensions of a thing, you could say "The dimensions of the square are 3 inches by 3 inches." You might also say "I need to measure the dimensions of the bedroom so I know how much paint to buy." If you mean other planes of existence, you could say "The alien came from another dimension." You can also say "That is an entirely different dimension than what we are talking about now."
Circular motion can be considered a type of periodic motion, where an object moves in a circular path with a constant speed. Harmonic motion, on the other hand, is a specific type of periodic motion where the restoring force is directly proportional to the displacement from equilibrium. While circular motion is periodic, it does not necessarily exhibit the characteristics of harmonic motion.
It's a 1960s pop band.We haven't identified a "fifth dimension". For that matter, it's not really correct to say that time is "the fourth dimension". Time is A dimension; whether it's "fourth" or not depends on how you count.Some theories of the universe predict that there are 9 or 10 spatial dimensions, along with time (there's one that predicts 25). A considerable amount of hand motion is involved in explaining why the universe appears to us to have only three (plus time).If there are additional spatial dimensions, we'd need to know considerably more about them before attempting any sort of rational ordering to say that "squizwards" (or whatever) was the fifth dimension, "odderwise" was the sixth, and so forth.
Time is. When people say "time is the fourth dimension", what they really mean is "It's mathematically consistent to treat time as if it were a dimension mutually orthogonal with the three 'normal' physical dimensions." I would propose to consider time(duration)as initial force of the Universe.
when can you say that the object is in motion
The relation between them is that balance must always be present among all of them. If there is no balance, you could not say that you are healthy, you must not only be healthy in one dimension, you must be healthy in all dimensions.
you could say motionless. there is no one word for "full of motion" though. You could also say slow, fast,slower, faster, etc.
At rest and in motion are relative terms. When we say 'in motion' or 'at rest' we mean relative to something else. If you were travelling in a car for instance, you would be at rest relative to the car but in motion relative to the outside world.
To say one thing and mean another is sarcasm.
Can't say for certain, but I am pretty sure the 4400 is newer.
non uniform motion