The vanity cards, as Chuck Lorre Productions call them, have said various things at the end of Big Bang Theory episodes. Just do a web search for Big Bang Theory Vanity Cards and you'll find the Wiki site that shows them all.
it did not say in the episode because he burned it
The Einstein Approximation Season 3 Episode 14
Good question by the way. Well, since the universe is infinite and if the big bang happened just once in infinity, then it has the ability to happen an infinite number of times. Which is why I dont suscribe to the theory. == Possibly. Right after the Big Crunch.
The Big Bang theory is just that, a theory. Hence, the Big Bang theory. It has not been proven any more than the creation theory has. We have no irrefutable proof that it ever happened. This is what makes the theory so exciting as an inspiration for other work. The quest is for evidence that supports or refutes the theory as we understand it; that is how science works. Sometimes refuting evidence is found when it was not being actively sought, causing crises in the scientific community. Technically speaking, creationism cannot be classed as a science theory. Scientific theories must, in principle, be able to be refuted by some experimental or observational means. This doesn't mean that all theories must be refuted. But there must be some methodology or framework that could in principle lead to a refutation, if the theory is in fact not true. Related to this is the fact that for adherents of creationism, creation is the one and only option; in principle, it is denied from the start that there could even possibly be a valid refutation of what is assumed to be true based on faith.ADDITIONAL EDIT: I want to point out a flaw in this answer. The word theory has a very different meaning to scientists. Theory means in the scientific world: A model that is repeatably supported by evidence and fully explains all known phenomena. A theory is not just a series of lgoical guesses, this is a hypothesis, a theory is the pinnicle of scientific creadibility. The big bang theory is supported by multiple feilds of science and there is no expereimental data of any kind to suggest it is flawed. There is in fact a large amount in accordance with it. This does not mean it is infallible, theories are often revised in the light of new data. However, theory means it is very very well founded, creationism is not a theory under the scientific meaning of the word. It is a belief.
Well in the field of science nothing can be believed firmly,bu taccording to evidences collected till now we have no way but to believe it.The Big Bang Theory states that the universe was created by the huge explosion of two concentrated mass about 13.7 billion years ago.The materials slowly collected to form galaxies and stars as it spread.It is also spreading now. But their are some religious implications about this theory.Some religious groups believe in it while others do not.
The Big Bang is just another theory.
The Big Bang theory isn't a mystery: the scientists working on it know exactly what they mean by what they say.
The Big bang theory states that the galaxies are in fact moving away from each other
It depends, because some might say 'scientists'. But not all scientists believe in this theory. Also, there are those who believe in a similar idea to the Big Bang, but it is not refered to as 'The Big Band Theory.'
it did not say in the episode because he burned it
That it expanded, and still is expanding, from an extremely dense and hot state.
You need to say what the discovery is that you have in mind, before anyone can answer.
Yes they say that in a few billion years a meteor will hit earth and another big bang theory will approach. apparently they can see it all ready with their advanced equipment.
First of all, the Big Bang was NOT an explosion; certainly not an explosion of dense matter into empty space. Secondly, all observational evidence points to the expansion having begun about 13.7 billion years ago.
Largely by being not related. The Big Bang theory doesn't really say anything at all about gravity.It's kind of distantly related through the "Theory of Everything", but the problem with this is that there is no Theory of Everything yet (actually, the situation is worse; there are multiple Theories of Everything, and we have no idea which is correct, or indeed if any of them are).
According to the believes of physics and the big bang, we know that the big bang was both big and a bang. Since we are still receiving radiation from the big bang, So considering that factor I would say that it was big and a bang. What do you believe?
It is important to first realize that the big bang theory is a theory; it is not a physical law on its own for which there might be loopholes. However, I think (correct me if I am wrong though), that you are referring to the idea that the big bang theory states that the Universe started with a bang which just came into being out of nothing. This is not entirely correct, the big bang theory does not implicitly say that the Universe came into being at some point; it only says that in the distant past the Universe was very small and that it has been expanding ever since. This statement is well verified by observations and measurements. It does not claim or explain how the Universe came into being. It might sound reasonable that the Universe somehow came into being as a point, and it would fit with the above statements, but the creation of the Universe itself is not yet something that science can say much about. There are models, such as string theory, that sometimes have things to say about this, but they are far from testable at this stage. So, yes, it is possible that something else happened before the Universe became tiny and started to expand, and it wouldn't contradict with the big bang theory at all.