It takes a counter-example. A scientific law makes predictions about how things will behave in a given situation. If something else happens and it cannot be explained by other factors then the law must be wrong - at least in those circumstances under which the test was conducted.
A scientific law cannot be destroyed; however, it can be revised or refined with new evidence or experimental data that contradicts the previously established law. Scientists may modify or update scientific laws to better align with the current understanding of the natural world.
nothing
Merely to show that the 'law' does not apply to all appropriate circumstances. A single exception will invalidate the law. e.g. Bodes Law in planet science.The 'doctrine of signatures' of earlier medicine would be another such, in which plants which crudely resembled a human organ, could be used to treat that organ!Hence liverwort.
scientific laws are never destoryed merely build on as new information and research comes about.
One example of scientific law, is The Law Of Gravity.
One example of scientific law, is The Law Of Gravity.
When you take a look at something so you can figure out what you need to do.
Scientific law is proven (for the most part) and scientific theory is not proven yet."However scientific law is a law that cannot be broken.
the value of scientific law is the set of observations...
A regular law has to do with the judicial system. A scientific law has to do with science.
scientific law is unlike a scientific theory in a sense that its the next step above a scientific theory.A scientific law is one that has been proven, a scientific theory has not been proven yet.
Scientific laws are based on thorough testing and evidence, so they cannot be destroyed. However, they can be revised or updated based on new experimental discoveries or observations that do not align with the current understanding. This process helps improve the accuracy and reliability of scientific laws over time.