That statement is incorrect. HF is a polar molecule because fluorine is more electronegative than hydrogen, causing the electron density to be pulled closer to the fluorine atom. As a result, HF has a partial positive charge on the hydrogen atom and a partial negative charge on the fluorine atom.
There is no such thing. A positive molecule will only be attracted to a negative molecule.
due to the difference in the between the two atoms in the molecule
A molecule that has a negative and positive end is a polar molecule.
HF is electronegative compared to O2. HF has delta plus and delta minus creating a dipole moment, it is a polar molecule therefore it has a higher boiling point. O2 which is symmetrical and non polar (looks like O=O) and therefore has no dipole moment.
Energy was released when the molecule was formed from its elements
HF is not an oxyacid; no oxygen in the molecule.
That statement is incorrect. HF is a polar molecule because fluorine is more electronegative than hydrogen, causing the electron density to be pulled closer to the fluorine atom. As a result, HF has a partial positive charge on the hydrogen atom and a partial negative charge on the fluorine atom.
A zwitterion, if you mean formal charges. If you just mean relatively positive and negative, then a polar molecule.
HF is the formula.
Yes! Polar covalent.
Polar molecules have partial negative and partial positive charges on opposing sides. They have a net dipole as a result of the opposing charges.
An molecule with a positive charge is a cation not sure if that's what you mean though.
There is no such thing. A positive molecule will only be attracted to a negative molecule.
due to the difference in the between the two atoms in the molecule
Nope
a diatomic molecule is a molecule with two atoms. so H2 is a diatomic molecule. HCl is also a diatomic molecule. C4H6 is not a diatomic molecule, because it has more then 2 atoms