it is the opposite of primary evidence
the difference is that Primary evidence is took from that moment and secondary is a piece of evidence found from the past.
Primary evidence means original copy of evidence and secondary evidence is true copy of evidence. Chandrakant S.Sao,B.Sc.,LLB Advocate High court Bomay
Try the British Museum. I saw his death mask there and bet they have primary evidence from him.
Primary evidence consists of items that can be measured directly. If temperature readings are taken in the middle of a city for years and they keep increasing, that is primary evidence that the temperature is increasing in that city. If recent pictures taken of ice in Antarctica, Greenland, and the Himalayas are compared with those taken a century ago, they show the glaciers have decreased in size. That is primary evidence glaciers are shrinking. Any direct measurement is primary evidence.
secondary evidence for sure
The statue was created in the time Octavian Augustus was emperor. A primary source is direct evidence from people who lived in that time period. In this case the direct evidence is a statue and it is the history of a person. The statue is direct evidence so it is a primary source.
there is statistics, dairy's and photos they are counted as primary evidence relay it is anything from the time of the event
Primary and secondary sources.
A newspaper can be considered a primary source when it reports firsthand accounts of events, as it provides original information at the time of occurrence. However, it can also be categorized as a secondary source when it analyzes or interprets events that have happened, offering a perspective or commentary on the primary evidence.
Yes. Primary sources are first-hand evidence supporting a topic. Therefore, a map that directly shows evidence towards what you are stating or researching would be considered a primary source. Good luck!
It depends on what it is being used as evidence of/for.