Exactly the same thing as a TNT bomb of the same yield.
35km
Heat is the obvious choice for controlled use of nuclear energy. In a weapon you also want a blast effect to destroy buildings etc.
This really depends on a number of factors, such as the yield of the weapon, the detonation altitude, and the terrain.
No, a nuclear weapon needs a specific geometry to detonate, and it has to be held in this position by very high explosives to keep it in this shape. In a nuclear reactor, if the reactor core goes critical then the force of the expanding coolant will blow the reactor apart, preventing a nuclear blast.
The meaning of the word nuclear weapon, is a weapon that has a nuclear warhead on it.
Mostly by blast as with any other explosive device. Also the heat and radiation contribute of course.
The effects of nuclear weapons break down into: 1- Thermal (heat damage) 2- Blast damage (shock wave) 3- Residual radiation & fall out.
A nuclear weapon must be armed before it can be used. They are all built with safety mechanisms so they will not go off accidently or on impact after the crash of a delivery vehicle.
A fire bomb is a conventional incendiary bomb: magnesium, napalm, etc. A nuclear bomb uses fission and/or fusion and is mostly a blast effect weapon.
There is no sound emitted by the nuclear fissions themselves. Of course if the material is made into a nuclear weapon then there is a loud sound but this is due to the rapid release of energy causing a blast wave in the surrounding air, not the actual fission process itself.
Yes the tsunami did trigger the nuclear blast because the water got into the nuclear reactor and buggered it up
This nuclear weapon is called an atomic bomb or a nuclear bomb