Put simply - it means it's far better to take steps to prevent negligence (perhaps through safer working practices) - than be forced to justify it later in a court of law.
It takes less time,money and energy to sort out the problem that would cause the negligence to occur - by whatever means necessary,than to waste resources covering backsides after a disastrous outcome.
It was so much easier to defend than attack in World War 1. There were so many enemies all around and it was only logical for countries to defend themselves.
it's easier to prevent because it's hard to clean water
because it was covered with hills n.
The city position was on the hills
Rome was divided in order to (supposedly) make it easier to rule and to defend.
It is easier to defend with water all around it.
to prevent wastage and it is easier to carry.
Creditors use finanical statement analysis because it makes it easier for them.
to prevent wastage and it is easier to carry.
it was built in this location because it was out at sea so it had a easy escape route and it was easier to defend
Proving medical malpractice is clearly not always simple. Where clear errors or negligence occurs, it is easier. Like, when a physician leaves a sponge in your during surgery or amputates the calf that is incorrect, you have clear-cut medical negligence. However, you would be looking to prove that this doctor acted not in the standard of care for the outward symptoms he/she was given. That is planning to require acquiring expert testimony by additional physicians or therapy professionals. Contact legal counsel who focuses primarily on medical malpractice to possess your case reviewed, should you experience you've a negligence situation.