What does ultimately real mean in Metaphysics?

Discourse on Metaphysics was created in 1686.

Metaphysics of War has 171 pages.

Metaphysics - album - was created in 2004.

I. C. Isbyam has written: 'Metaphysics and modern research' -- subject(s): Metaphysics 'Metaphysics and Modern Research 1927'

In philosophy, metaphysics is the category that includes all the physical aspects of an item. The metaphysics of a chair would be seat, legs, backrest, etc.

No. Metaphysics is a term generally used for the supernatural or for a branch of philosophy. Science can not and does not attempt to prove or disprove metaphysics.

Metaphysics is the branch of philosophy that deals with answering questions about the nature of truth and knowledge. People who study metaphysics try to determine if there are any absolute truths, if we can ever know something entirely, and how our perceived senses relate to the "real world."

Jonathan Tallant has written: 'Metaphysics' -- subject(s): Textbooks, Metaphysics

'Metaphysics' is the wrong word to use here.

Jeremy Kirby has written: 'Aristotle's metaphysics' -- subject(s): Metaphysics

"After" That's what it meant in ancient Greek. The word "metaphysics" got its name because in the list of Aristotle's books, the Metaphysics was the book that came right after the Physics. However, the word became enormously popular as the philosophy of Aristotle became popular in the Middle Ages and people started to imagine that the prefix "meta" had to do with the relation of the content of the Metaphysics, as opposed to that of the Physics and people started to use it to mean the overarching or underlying principles behind something (as the Metaphysics dealt with the underlying principles of Physics). Thus in newly-formed words like metacognition, the prefix is used to mean "underlying principles of".

The two main questions Metaphysics tries to answers is "What is there?" "What is it like?" metaphysics attempts to clarify the fundamental notions by which people understand the world, such as existance,objects and the properties of space and time

Ivan Soll has written: 'An introduction to Hegel's metaphysics' -- subject(s): Metaphysics

Pietro Faggiotto has written: 'La metafisica kantiana della analogia' -- subject(s): Analogy, Contributions in metaphysics, History, Metaphysics 'Introduzione alla metafisica kantiana dell'analogia' -- subject(s): Metaphysics 'Saggio sulla struttura della metafiscica' -- subject(s): Metaphysics 'Per una metafisica dell'esperienza integrale' -- subject(s): Metaphysics

The doctrines and teachings of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (commonly called the "Mormon" church) do not correlate with those of metaphysics. That is, you could not honestly believe in both metaphysics and Mormonism. That being said, Mormons are not 'against' metaphysics. It is a fundamental belief of Mormons that all people should have the freedom to believe and worship as they choose. Mormons recognize metaphysics as a legitimate belief system, just one which they don't personally believe in. Mormons are welcome to study and learn about metaphysics if it interests them.

Jean Randall Rosenberg has written: 'Readings in metaphysics' -- subject(s): Metaphysics

Charles Augustus Baylis has written: 'Metaphysics' -- subject(s): Metafysica, Metaphysics

William Bernard Collins has written: 'Metaphysics and man' -- subject(s): Metaphysics

Samarendra Kumar Verma has written: 'The nature of metaphysics' -- subject(s): Metaphysics

Ian Bell has written: 'Metaphysics as an Aristotelian science' -- subject(s): Metafysica, Metaphysics

Paul S. Miklowitz has written: 'Metaphysics to metafictions' -- subject(s): Metaphysics, History

Richard Harry Miller has written: 'Naturalism in Buridan's metaphysics' -- subject(s): Metaphysics

Frank S. Merritt has written: 'Listen: metaphysics' -- subject(s): Metaphysics, Reality

Cosmological metaphysics is a branch of philosophy which deals with the place of mankind in the universe. It attempts to understand and explain why everything came to be.

the three milesians were different from their styles. they do not have same viewpoints about the things