it means that there childrens death could not be removed
also that it wont stop the anger
it means that there childrens death could not be removed also that it wont stop the anger
"The continuance of their parents' rage, which, but their children's end, naught could remove." The deaths of Romeo and Juliet end the feud between the families. Montague promises to raise a golden statue of Juliet, and Capulet promises to do the same for Romeo.
Because the story is not over. The prologue makes this clear at the very beginning. "Whose misadventured piteous overthrows do with their deaths bury their parents' strife", and "their parents' rage which but their children's end naught could remove" both tell us that the story ends when the parents reconcile.
And the continuance of their parents' rage, Which, but their children's end, nought could remove, it basically means that nothing except for the death of their children could stop the fued.
Steven tried his hardest, but it was all for naught, as Tyler won the race in the end.
Especially, the lines "do with their death bury their parents' strife" foreshadows not only the deaths of Romeo and Juliet but also the families' reconciliation. In case you weren't listening the first time, he says it again with the lines "their parents rage, which but their children's end naught could remove."
"their parents' rage, which but their children's end nought could remove." The "nought", which means "nothing" has been moved from its usual position just after the word "which" in order to make the metre better. If you move it back you get "which nought but their children's end could remove" which might be easier to understand, if metrically inferior.
The phrase "which but their children end nought could remove" suggests that something can only be resolved or eliminated through the actions or decisions of the next generation. It implies that the current situation or problem is unchangeable by the present, and only the children or future descendants have the potential to bring about change. The language is somewhat archaic, emphasizing a sense of inevitability linked to lineage and time.
Net, nut, not, night, naught, neat
Oh, dude, that's like some Shakespearean riddle right there! So, basically, that question is asking about a parent who can't stop their kids from meeting a tragic fate in today's terms. It's like asking why parents can't just hit the rewind button and prevent their kids from facing doom. I mean, parenting is tough, but time travel? That's a whole other level of responsibility!
because Anna Boleyn could not have any more Children.
The mere placement of a question mark at the end of a line of words does not make it a question. Please rephrase or remove this line.