The North had little cotton for there Textile Mills The South had little manufactured goods and food (yes the majority of the Nations food was grown in the North) the north however managed to come out the war with some economic growth were as the souths economy crashed and burned
The future of political and economic power for freed slaves, and the future of North-South economic and political relations.
South enslaved North no
According to recent numerical research and records, the north had a few more casualties than the south during the Civil War, or the battle between North and South. The south suffered 490,309 soldiers killed, wounded, captured or missing, while the north suffered 596,670.
According to recent numerical research and records, the north had a few more casualties than the south during the Civil War, or the battle between North and South. The south suffered 490,309 soldiers killed, wounded, captured or missing, while the north suffered 596,670.
Chung's reputation suffered a severe blow when it was learned that state funds had helped facilitate the event.
An economic challenge that south america faces today is environmental issues.
The North had the greater economic resources as it was industrialised while the South relayed on a slave and cotton economy.
what is local economic development in the north and south according to capstone studies 2011
The North and South separated due to differing views on issues such as slavery, states' rights, and economic policies. These tensions culminated in the American Civil War, fought from 1861 to 1865, resulting in the secession of Southern states and the formation of the Confederate States of America.
Slavery was a big issue between the north and the south.
NO. Only North Korea is. South Korea is capitalist.
There was a large manufacturing base in the North. In the South, it's the industry is mostly agriculture.