It is because both the private sector and public sector have a say in answering the basic economic questions, thus there will be a degree of high efficiancy (due to the private sector involvement) and social welfare too (due to the public sector involvement).
It allows the Government to intervene when the economy faces market failure. The mixed economic system allows markets to operate freely until it fails to allocate resources efficiently, after this, the government agencies, such as the EU Competition Commission, are able to correct for these failures. If this had been a completely free economic system, Government agencies wouldn't have the means of power to be able to intervene. Furthermore, if it was a centrally planned economic system (communist systems), the Government wouldn't have any drivers behind the intervention which may cause government failure for the market. (Mobeen Iqbal, Bahrain)
Writes ModelCitizen:.
Government bodies are an amazingly consistent display of their failure to utilize resources efficiently. In fact because they do not face monetary profit or loss, they have no idea if what they are doing is efficient. Questions such as what is an acceptable time for people to wait for medical treatment are unable to be answered efficiently by government, and people suffer for their failures. Extreme examples include North Korea when compared to South Korea - there is no difference between the two countries except for the choice of South Korea to all more freedoms to their people. Governments create Propaganda of 'market failures' which typically can only be defined as the price being higher than in the past, so they can 'intervene' to be able to provide an excuse for their existence, and to gain power at the expense of individuals. Societies that have greater government interventions such as regulations, subsidies, taxes, etc, are much worse off economically than those with less interventions.
It is because both the private sector and public sector have a say in answering the basic economic questions, thus there will be a degree of high efficiancy (due to the private sector involvement) and social welfare too (due to the public sector involvement).
It allows the Government to intervene when the economy faces market failure. The mixed economic system allows markets to operate freely until it fails to allocate resources efficiently, after this, the government agencies, such as the EU Competition Commission, are able to correct for these failures. If this had been a completely free economic system, Government agencies wouldn't have the means of power to be able to intervene. Furthermore, if it was a centrally planned economic system (communist systems), the Government wouldn't have any drivers behind the intervention which may cause government failure for the market. (Mobeen Iqbal, Bahrain)
Writes ModelCitizen:.
Government bodies are an amazingly consistent display of their failure to utilize resources efficiently. In fact because they do not face monetary profit or loss, they have no idea if what they are doing is efficient. Questions such as what is an acceptable time for people to wait for medical treatment are unable to be answered efficiently by government, and people suffer for their failures. Extreme examples include North Korea when compared to South Korea - there is no difference between the two countries except for the choice of South Korea to all more freedoms to their people. Governments create Propaganda of 'market failures' which typically can only be defined as the price being higher than in the past, so they can 'intervene' to be able to provide an excuse for their existence, and to gain power at the expense of individuals. Societies that have greater government interventions such as regulations, subsidies, taxes, etc, are much worse off economically than those with less interventions.
The biggest economic problem for Alexander Hamilton and his new government was recovering from the 54 million dollar federal debt arising from the Revolution. The states owed another 25 million. Confederate paper money was worthless.
They faced multiple problems...though the main ones were national debt,and the arguments over Government power balance.
The country actually prospered. New commercial businesses were developed and the country's government developed new jobs to develop national security.
Decreasing government spending.
all privately owned businesses were given up to the government
They faced multiple problems...though the main ones were national debt,and the arguments over Government power balance.
What is new faces in the government mostly about
The biggest economic problem for Alexander Hamilton and his new government was recovering from the 54 million dollar federal debt arising from the Revolution. The states owed another 25 million. Confederate paper money was worthless.
They faced multiple problems...though the main ones were national debt,and the arguments over Government power balance.
Broken faces.
The biggest and most important issues the new federal government had to contend with were economic problems. The Revolutionary War debt was huge and individual states didn't feel they should be taxed to pay for it.
The country actually prospered. New commercial businesses were developed and the country's government developed new jobs to develop national security.
to address continuing economic problems with new reforms
The economic reform program spearheaded by Franklin D. Roosevelt to fix the problems the Great Depression had caused the nation was called the New Deal. The key ideas of the New Deal were to cause a market shift within the American economy. To do this, Roosevelt created thousands of new jobs, reformed business, labor, and government methods of dealing with the depression, and greatly increased government control in American's supposed free enterprise economy.
government and ilness.
to address continuing economic problems with new reforms
Food shortage and government dept.