Probably about the same as any other country's machine guns in any wars they've won. We weren't the first to have them - by the time we employed them, our enemies did, as well.
Machine guns didn't cause wars.
The Bren light machine guns were used in World War II, the Korean war, the Falklands War and the 1991 Gulf War. Bren light guns were a series of light machine guns adopted by the British in the 1930's.
They shot people in the crotch this time.
Guns in Star Wars are generally referred to as "blasters."
By "blood" he means the deaths of wars and by "iron" he means the technology used in these wars like cannons, machine guns etc..
Guns have dramatically effected the effectiveness and outcomes of wars since they have been invented without guns we would not win wars
Well, soldiers fighting in the war had to dig trenches and set up barbed wires along the trenches. They would shoot enemies that were approaching and the barbed wire would slow them down. The trenches provided protection(sometimes) from machine guns.
Guns made it easier to shoot the other side, making wars faster and bloodier.
probably not because we need guns to survive from robbers and wars but there might be no guns in 6978
Generally, no.
Machine guns became common weapons in World War I. These weapons were very deadly and highly effective in the war.
Both wars utilized Airplanes, tanks, artillery barrages, and Anti Submarine Convoys. Both wars used machine guns and snipers heavily, first wars were mass production was first used on all sides.