It will greatly effect the humans as any organism when removed or disturbed from the food chain or food web ultimately effects us . As the food chain of bald eagle is :-
PRODUCER---------->HERBIVORE----------->CARNIVORE------------------>CARNIVORE
(CABBAGE) (RABBIT) [SECONDARY [TERTIARY
CONSUMER] CONSUMER]
(SNAKE) (BALD EAGLE)
Now if the tertiary consumer will be removed the population of snake would increase which may cause a severe effect on humans that they would have to remain in fear all time for the snakes....
Answer
Not much. While we might have an emotional reaction to the loss of a species (and the U.S would probably change its mascot), there are a wide variety of Birds of Prey that would simply replace the bald eagle's niche in the ecosystem.
What they eat (kingfisher) will become plentiful and the balance of nature will be disturbed. Their prey would grow into thousands and will over run the Areas they live in. also the dragonfly larva would decrease as well as the stickleback and the diving beetle. Which would increase what they eat i.e. water fleas and lesser water boatman but the plant organisms would also decrease because of the increase of water fleas and lesser water boatman.
until DDT was banned the Bald Eagle did face extinction because the pesticide weakened the shell and when the parents would lay on the eggs it would break the shell.Now the bald eagle does not face extinction because they no longer use DDT eagles are making a wonderful comeback
it would affect humans a lot because humans eat fish and i think some fish eat plankton, so if plankton goes extinct then humans might die (i think)
What? extinction is the total annihilation of a species. In terms of humans, if there were no males or females left to reproduce with, that would ultimately cause our extinction.
the end of the world as we kno it
There would be no discernible physical effect on humans.
The extinction rate is much higher than it would be without humans, therefore most animals would have not gone extinct had it not been for human intervention.
They can, but overexposure would be difficult.
This would be an incorrect premise, the most obvious answer being that Dinosaurs ruled the earth long before humans came along. Dinosaurs are now extinct and that would have been more than a mass extinction, it was global extinction.
the answer to the question is extinction
Damaged ozone layer would eventually cause extinction. It is one of the most important prospects of the earth.
Is extinction the word you're looking for ?
What is the effect of impurity of aspirin in humans body