The businesslike tone
Answer: He has no morals and might possibly be insane - APEX :) (It's correct answer, bc I say so)
Such a narrator is described as an objective narrator. In reality it is impossible to be totally objective in reporting anything.
An objective narrator reports action and dialog without telling the reader what characters think or feel.
It is true.
The narrator is the 'person' telling the story and there are many degrees ofintimacy and types involving point-of-view, tone, mood and other factors. Now the competency of a narrative is how well the narrator does his job. In murder mysteries the narrator has to be mostly invisible (not exist as a character in the story- unless its first person intimate of course) and yet be able to present the clues without to blatantly flagging them as such. In cultural reminiscing, such as in Mark Twain's work, the narrator has to maintain a cultural and character profile, as well as a certain dialect. (Not all reminiscing require a dialect - its just that Mark Twain did). To depart from such at any point in the story shows narrative incompetence.
Without knowing who the narrator is or reading the passage you just had to read, there's no way for anyone else to see through your eyes and know the answer to this question.
Answer: He has no morals and might possibly be insane - APEX :) (It's correct answer, bc I say so)
on Saturdays the narrator would ride in a sailboat one day he went out to far and got swept out to sea. At nightfall a small brig that was headed to london picked him up they made him work his passage without pay as a common sailor.
There is no passage to go from. It is difficult to make a conclusion without the passage being present.
There is no passage to go from. It is difficult to make a conclusion without the passage being present.
An uninvolved narrator would present the story without expressing personal opinions or showing bias toward the characters or events. They would stick to describing the action and dialogue without delving into the characters' thoughts or feelings. This type of narrator remains detached and objective throughout the storytelling process.
It cannot without radioactive decay, and it is impractical to imagine copper (element 29) undergoing enough positron emissions to become iridium (element 77). There is no chemistry which can possibly turn copper into iridium, and no known physics either.
Such a narrator is described as an objective narrator. In reality it is impossible to be totally objective in reporting anything.
Such a narrator is described as an objective narrator. In reality it is impossible to be totally objective in reporting anything.
An element of internal monologue in modernist writing is the use of stream of consciousness technique, where the narrator's thoughts and feelings are presented in a continuous flow without a traditional structure. This technique provides insight into the character's mind and allows readers to experience the immediacy of their thoughts.
An objective narrator reports action and dialog without telling the reader what characters think or feel.
the author is the narrator's key, without your author you need no narratorbut then without your narrator your piece can't be annouced, your narrator is your author's spokesman.the relationship beetween them is incerdible strong, they need eachother, BIG TIME!your welcome(;