0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why did most scientists reject Wegner theory for nearly a half century?
They rejected Wenger's theory for half a century because he didn't have the evidence to prove his theory No, He did have evidence to prove his theory, they just did not believe him- TheSystem because of their lack of knowledge of the Earth He actually had evidence, but it was actually because the hypothesis interferred with their own hypothesis about how mountains form.
What evidence proves that gravity is a force at a distance?
We observe planets, moons, comets, and artificial satellites and space probes moving in relation to the central body within their orbits exactly as we would expect them to move if the theory of universal gravitation is true. This evidence supports the theory of force at a distance due to universal gravitation, but doesn't prove it. It's still "only a theory", which can never be proven, but can be disproven in half-a-second if we ever see a situation where it's not working that way.
Who says things are fall down in earth due to gravity?
That concept was originated and developed in detail by Sir Isaac Newton, in the 17th Century. The theory is impossible to 'prove'. But it does accurately explain the motions of all the planets in our solar system, and if we use Newton's mathematics to plan the routes of spacecraft, then they always go where we want them to go. But none of this 'proves' the theory. If you or anyone else brings reproducible evidence showing that the theory is wrong, then it'll be thrown out, and a better explanation will be sought. That's how science works.
Does the multiverse exist?
no one knows The Multiverse is simply a theory. No one really knows, and no one can prove it. yet. You simply have to believe.
How was the copernican theory proven correct?
Bruno did a pretty good job of it, and was burned at the stake for his troubles. Galileo's observations of the solar system were very thorough, and he had a decent telescope with which to record his findings. The evidence Galileo gathered was quite compelling.
What was Abraham Ortelius's evidence?
Abraham Ortelius was a cartographer and mapmaker who is known for creating the first modern atlas in 1570 called "Theatrum Orbis Terrarum". His evidence was based on compiling information from various sources, including explorers' reports, travelers' journals, and existing maps, to create a comprehensive and accurate representation of the world known at that time. Ortelius's atlas was groundbreaking in its use of a uniform scale and design, which set a new standard for mapmaking.
What were the four types of evidence Wegener showed to prove his theory?
?
What is statistical evidence?
Statistical evidence refers to data or information that has been analyzed and interpreted using statistical methods to support or challenge a hypothesis or claim. It helps quantify uncertainty and provides insights into the likelihood of an event occurring, making it a valuable tool in decision-making and research.
What are 2 main pieces of evidence that prove wegner's theory?
gjhfhj
What evidence did Arthur Holmes have to support his theory?
he didn't have anything to prove
Why did most scientists reject Wegner theory for nearly a half century?
They rejected Wenger's theory for half a century because he didn't have the evidence to prove his theory No, He did have evidence to prove his theory, they just did not believe him- TheSystem because of their lack of knowledge of the Earth He actually had evidence, but it was actually because the hypothesis interferred with their own hypothesis about how mountains form.
What did Alfred Weneger try to prove?
Alfred Weneger was trying to prove his theory of Continental Drift. Many other scientists before him had the same theory, but they never could prove it. He had five pieces of evidence.
How was Dalton's atomic theory similar to democritus's atomic theory?
They both thought the same theory but Dalton had evidence to prove it, unlike Democritus.
Is a kracken real?
i believe that the kracken really does exist, but we have no real evidence to prove that theory.....
Why were most scientists disagreeing with Alfred Wegeners continental drift theory?
There was no evidence to prove it
Future evidence can prove a scientific theory to be incorrect.Is the following true or false?
True.
Can a hypothesis lead to a theory.?
Yes, because if enough people prove the hypothesis and produce evidence supporting it it can become a theory.
