0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Differences between psychology and common sense?
Psychology is backed by evidence. common sense is not backed by evidence and can not be proved to be right or wrong, Psychology must be backed by hard evidence and must have proof and experiments done to prove this .
Why did it take so long for psychology to be recognized?
Psychology was not considered a real science because there wasn't a way to actually prove it. also, when it was recognized as a real science, there was no way of approaching it.
What branch of science is psychology in?
psychology is a type of science. psychology is the study of the mind. many scientists say psychology is separate but it's still a form of science
When did Psychology become an independent branch of science?
year when Psychology became an independent branch of science?
How do you differentiate psychology as traditional belief and psychology as a science?
Psychology as a traditional belief is base on traditions and supertitions while Psychology as a science uses measurement techniques to study sensation.
Is psychology objective and value free?
psychology is a science and as such as is objective. it is a self-criticizing and reforming science that is dynamic and adapts to evidence that is available at a given time without neglecting the possibility of contrary evidence. Theories in psychology and every other science can not be proven but can be confirmed with evidence.
What is science evidence?
In science, evidence is any result of an experiment done with the scientific method. Evidence and experiments to acquire evidence are methods by which one can scientifically prove a claim.
Differences between psychology and common sense?
Psychology is backed by evidence. common sense is not backed by evidence and can not be proved to be right or wrong, Psychology must be backed by hard evidence and must have proof and experiments done to prove this .
Why did it take so long for psychology to be recognized?
Psychology was not considered a real science because there wasn't a way to actually prove it. also, when it was recognized as a real science, there was no way of approaching it.
How can you use math in science?
To figure out formulas and equations and claculations to prove or add evidence to a theory.
Does evidence prove or disprove evolution?
Law and math prove things. Science supports tentative ( more or less ) explanations of natural phenomenon with evidence. The evidence overwhelmingly supports evolutionary theory. PS Evolution itself is a observed and observable fact.
What is the difference between scientific and non-scientific evidence?
Evidence is something observable (measurable) or tangible that provides support to an explanation or shows that the explanation needs to be modified. The term "prove" (in the US, generally) is much more often used within the legal system, not in science, as science doesn't really try to "prove" things, but to support or refute them with evidence. The more evidence, the more likely it is to be true. Evidence, by definition, cannot be non-scientific.
Why is psychology not yet a complete science?
"Complete science?" It's not science at all. http://vps.arachnoid.com/psychology/
Why para psychology not considered as part of psychology?
Given that psychology is essentially a study of psychic abilities and the paranormal, it proves difficult to be tested. Psychology is a science, requiring careful experimentation and research to truly justify any findings in its studies. Parapsychology has yet to show extraordinary, or for that matter, concrete evidence to justify existence of the paranormal, or for it to obtain any credibility as a true science.
How does an appreciation of individuality enhance the science of psychology?
How does an appreciation of individuality enhance science of psychology
Contemporary psychology is best defined as the science of?
Contemporary psychology is best defined as the science of
If science shows God is a delusion why are so many scientists Christians?
Some people is Science, especially a few in Physics are in Science to prove the existence of god to the world, and say that much Scientific Evidence points to a god, and some say the evidence points to natural process.
