0
What evidence is there to prove that montresor's killed fortunato?
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
He shows Fortunato a trowel. This is ironic because he later uses it do bury Fortunato alive. It also show Montresor's ignorance because Freemasonry (aka Masonic order) and the International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers (aka masons) are two completely different groups of people.
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
In Edgar Allan Poe's short story "The Cask of Amontillado," the evidence that Montresor killed Fortunato is primarily based on Montresor's detailed narration of the events leading up to the murder. Montresor admits to luring Fortunato into the catacombs, getting him drunk, chaining him to the wall, and then burying him alive behind a wall of bricks. The story is told from Montresor's perspective, leaving readers to rely on his account as the only evidence of Fortunato's death.
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoIt is an actual account by Montresor himself 50 years later... Why would there be any reasons to lie? There would not be a story if he was lying...
There was no investigation of his disappearance so to the public and his family there was no evidence which is why Montresor got away with the murder, and could confess it 50 years later.
Wiki User
∙ 12y agohe sead that to see if he was in the club with the other people.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What best describes Fortunato's motivation in the story?
Fortunato's motivation in the story "The Cask of Amontillado" by Edgar Allan Poe is primarily his pride and arrogance. He is eager to prove his wine connoisseurship to Montresor and falls victim to his own hubris, leading to his downfall. Additionally, his desire for status and social standing plays a role in his ultimate demise.
What evidence prove that Pangaea didn't existed?
You can't prove a negative with direct evidence.
How does Montresor lure Fortunato farther into the catacombs?
Montresor lures Fortunato further into the catacombs by appealing to Fortunato's pride as a wine connoisseur, offering him the chance to taste a rare vintage Amontillado. He plays on Fortunato's vanity and ego, knowing that Fortunato will not resist the opportunity to prove his expertise and superiority.
How does the narrator persuade Fortunato to come with him in 'The Cask of Amontillado'?
In "The Cask of Amontillado," the narrator persuades Fortunato to come with him by appealing to Fortunato's pride in his connoisseurship of wine. He entices Fortunato with the promise of tasting a rare and valuable cask of Amontillado, knowing that Fortunato's ego and desire to prove his expertise will make him eager to go with the narrator to the catacombs.
What are the differences between the fact and evidence?
A fact is an objective truth or reality that can be proven or verified. Evidence, on the other hand, is information or data that supports a claim or proposition. Facts are concrete and incontrovertible, while evidence is used to establish the truth of a statement or argument.
How do I prove employee dishonesty?
The best way to prove employee dishonesty is by keeping a record of evidence that may prove your view. Without evidence or a witness, it may be difficult to prove it.
Falsehood is to deceive as evidence is to what?
Falsehood is to deceive as evidence is to prove. Prove is a word that is commonlyÊ used in law courts.
What can evidence provide?
Evidence can prove, or disprove, the case against you.
Why didn't fortunato like lucchesi in The Cask of Amontillado?
Fortunato and Luchesi were seen as rivals when it came to wine expertise. Fortunato saw Luchesi as a threat to his own reputation and pride in his knowledge of wine. This rivalry led Fortunato to dismiss Luchesi's skills and belittle him.
What is the difference between proof and prove?
proof is a physical truth which noone needs to prove it otherwise. prove is the action taken to have proof.
What will you do to prove your answer to others?
By giving evidence.
When are you a suspect?
when there is enough evidence to prove it
