0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is it true that Conclusions related to historical events are limited to subjective evaluation of the existing evidence?
true
Can you give me an example sentence with the word historical?
historical evidence suggests this theory. The war was Historical.
How do you know that the events of the eruption in Pompeii took place?
there's plenty of archaelogical evidence as well as written historical sources.
How do timelines show historical events or periods?
it can help you understand historical events.
Who is the person who writes and chronicles historical events?
historical novilist
Why do historians look for evidence?
Historians look for evidence to support their understanding and interpretation of the past. Evidence helps validate their arguments, provide context, and support conclusions about historical events and figures. By examining various forms of evidence, historians can construct a more accurate and nuanced understanding of history.
What is an historical evidence?
Historical evidence refers to any physical or written proof that validates events or people from the past. This evidence can include artifacts, documents, inscriptions, or other tangible items that provide insight into historical events or cultures. It is crucial for historians and researchers to analyze historical evidence to construct accurate narratives of the past.
Which method separates modern historians from ancient Greek historians?
Basing historical accounts on reliable evidence
What do historians intend to do when they make a claim?
Historians intend to support their claims with evidence from historical sources, such as documents, artifacts, and other records. They aim to provide a well-reasoned interpretation of the past based on the available evidence. Their goal is to construct an accurate and reliable account of historical events and developments.
Which historical term describes the specific primary and secondary sources that historians use to support their claims?
Historical evidence.
Is it true conclusions related to historical events are limited to subjective evaluation of the existing evidence?
true
Conclusions related to historical events are limited to evaluating the existing evidence. True False?
True
True or false Conclusions related to historical events are limited to evaluating the existing evidence?
True
Is it true that Conclusions related to historical events are limited to subjective evaluation of the existing evidence?
true
What evidence exists to support witchcraft?
All claims of supernatural events and abilities comes from empirical and anecdotal evidence. There is no scientific evidence for any of it.
Can you give me an example sentence with the word historical?
historical evidence suggests this theory. The war was Historical.
Which of the following statement about interpreting historical evidence is true?
New sources and ideas may change the interpreting of events
