answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Why do historians look for evidence?

Historians look for evidence to support their understanding and interpretation of the past. Evidence helps validate their arguments, provide context, and support conclusions about historical events and figures. By examining various forms of evidence, historians can construct a more accurate and nuanced understanding of history.


What is an historical evidence?

Historical evidence refers to any physical or written proof that validates events or people from the past. This evidence can include artifacts, documents, inscriptions, or other tangible items that provide insight into historical events or cultures. It is crucial for historians and researchers to analyze historical evidence to construct accurate narratives of the past.


What describes a historical argument?

A historical argument presents a claim based on evidence from historical sources and research. It aims to explain and interpret past events, often analyzing the causes and consequences of historical events or developments. Effective historical arguments are supported by strong evidence and critical analysis.


Which method separates modern historians from ancient Greek historians?

Basing historical accounts on reliable evidence


What do historians intend to do when they make a claim?

Historians intend to support their claims with evidence from historical sources, such as documents, artifacts, and other records. They aim to provide a well-reasoned interpretation of the past based on the available evidence. Their goal is to construct an accurate and reliable account of historical events and developments.


Which historical term describes the specific primary and secondary sources that historians use to support their claims?

Historical evidence.


True or false Conclusions related to historical events are limited to evaluating the existing evidence?

True. Conclusions related to historical events are based on evaluating existing evidence such as documents, artifacts, and eyewitness accounts. These conclusions are subject to change as new evidence is discovered or alternative interpretations are considered.


Is it true conclusions related to historical events are limited to subjective evaluation of the existing evidence?

true


Conclusions related to historical events are limited to evaluating the existing evidence. True False?

True


Is it true that Conclusions related to historical events are limited to subjective evaluation of the existing evidence?

true


What evidence exists to support witchcraft?

All claims of supernatural events and abilities comes from empirical and anecdotal evidence. There is no scientific evidence for any of it.


Is the Book of Mormon historically accurate?

The historical accuracy of the Book of Mormon is a topic of debate among scholars and religious experts. Some believe that the events and people described in the book are based on real historical events, while others argue that there is limited archaeological evidence to support its claims. Ultimately, the question of the Book of Mormon's historical accuracy is a matter of personal belief and interpretation.